• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验:克拉霉素对比左氧氟沙星一线三联及序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌。

Clinical trial: clarithromycin vs. levofloxacin in first-line triple and sequential regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara, Caceres, Spain.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May;31(10):1077-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04274.x. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04274.x
PMID:20180787
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates with standard triple therapy have declined to unacceptable levels.

AIM

To compare clarithromycin and levofloxacin in triple and sequential first-line regimens.

METHODS

A total of 460 patients were randomized into four 10-day therapeutic schemes (115 patients per group): (i) standard OCA, omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin; (ii) triple OLA, omeprazole, levofloxacin and amoxicillin; (iii) sequential OACM, omeprazole plus amoxicillin for 5 days, followed by omeprazole plus clarithromycin plus metronidazole for 5 days; and (iv) modified sequential OALM, using levofloxacin instead of clarithromycin. Eradication was confirmed by 13C-urea breath test. Adverse effects and compliance were assessed by a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Per protocol cure rates were: OCA (66%; 95% CI: 57-74%), OLA (82.6%; 75-89%), OACM (80.8%; 73-88%) and OALM (85.2%; 78-91%). Intention-to-treat cure rates were: OCA (64%; 55-73%), OLA (80.8%; 73-88%), OACM (76.5%; 69-85%) and OALM (82.5%; 75-89%). Eradication rates were lower with OCA than with all the other regimens (P < 0.05). No differences in compliance or adverse effects were demonstrated among treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Levofloxacin-based and sequential therapy are superior to standard triple scheme as first-line regimens in a setting with high clarithromycin resistance. However, all of these therapies still have a 20% failure rate.

摘要

背景

标准三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的成功率已降至不可接受的水平。

目的

比较克拉霉素和左氧氟沙星在三联和序贯一线方案中的疗效。

方法

将 460 例患者随机分为 4 个 10 天疗程(每组 115 例):(i)标准 OCA 方案,奥美拉唑、克拉霉素和阿莫西林;(ii)三联 OLA 方案,奥美拉唑、左氧氟沙星和阿莫西林;(iii)序贯 OACM 方案,奥美拉唑+阿莫西林 5 天,然后奥美拉唑+克拉霉素+甲硝唑 5 天;(iv)改良序贯 OALM 方案,用左氧氟沙星代替克拉霉素。采用 13C-尿素呼气试验确认根除。通过问卷评估不良反应和依从性。

结果

按方案治愈的患者比例分别为:OCA(66%;95%CI:57-74%)、OLA(82.6%;75-89%)、OACM(80.8%;73-88%)和 OALM(85.2%;78-91%)。意向治疗治愈的患者比例分别为:OCA(64%;55-73%)、OLA(80.8%;73-88%)、OACM(76.5%;69-85%)和 OALM(82.5%;75-89%)。OCA 的根除率低于其他所有方案(P < 0.05)。但在依从性和不良反应方面,各组之间无差异。

结论

在克拉霉素耐药率较高的地区,左氧氟沙星为基础的治疗方案和序贯疗法优于标准三联方案。但这些疗法的失败率仍有 20%。

相似文献

1
Clinical trial: clarithromycin vs. levofloxacin in first-line triple and sequential regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication.临床试验:克拉霉素对比左氧氟沙星一线三联及序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May;31(10):1077-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04274.x. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
2
Efficacy and safety of Levofloxacin, Clarithromycin and Esomeprazol as first line triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Middle East. Prospective, randomized, blind, comparative, multicenter study.左氧氟沙星、克拉霉素和埃索美拉唑三联疗法作为中东地区幽门螺杆菌根除的一线治疗的疗效和安全性:前瞻性、随机、盲法、对照、多中心研究。
Eur J Intern Med. 2010 Aug;21(4):310-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2010.05.011. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
3
[new one-week triple therapies with metronidazole for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: clarithromycin or amoxycillin as the second antibiotic].[采用甲硝唑的新型一周三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌:以克拉霉素或阿莫西林作为第二种抗生素]
Med Clin (Barc). 1998 Jan 17;110(1):1-5.
4
Ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapies as a second-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori in Turkish patients.基于枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁的三联疗法作为土耳其患者幽门螺杆菌感染的二线治疗方案
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Apr;20(4):637-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03801.x.
5
Levofloxacin-based triple therapy in first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication.基于左氧氟沙星的三联疗法用于幽门螺杆菌根除的一线治疗。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):1985-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00716.x.
6
[Treatment with omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin over 6 days in patients with Helicobacter pylori-infected duodenal ulcer].[幽门螺杆菌感染的十二指肠溃疡患者接受奥美拉唑、克拉霉素和阿莫西林治疗6天]
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Jan;22(1):1-6.
7
Lansoprazole, levofloxacin and amoxicillin triple therapy vs. quadruple therapy as second-line treatment of resistant Helicobacter pylori infection.兰索拉唑、左氧氟沙星和阿莫西林三联疗法与四联疗法作为耐药幽门螺杆菌感染二线治疗的比较
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Feb 1;23(3):421-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02764.x.
8
Comparison of 1-week and 2-week triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin in peptic ulcer patients with Helicobacter pylori infection: results of a randomized controlled trial.奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌感染消化性溃疡患者1周与2周的比较:一项随机对照试验的结果
J Gastroenterol. 1999;34 Suppl 11:76-9.
9
Nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy: empirical and tailored efficacy versus standard triple therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible Helicobacter pylori and versus sequential therapy for clarithromycin-resistant strains.非铋四联(联合)疗法:对克拉霉素敏感的幽门螺杆菌的经验性和针对性疗效与标准三联疗法相比,以及对克拉霉素耐药菌株的序贯疗法相比。
Helicobacter. 2012 Aug;17(4):269-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2012.00947.x. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
10
2-week triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection is better than 1-week in clinical practice: a large prospective single-center randomized study.临床实践中,幽门螺杆菌感染的2周三联疗法优于1周疗法:一项大型前瞻性单中心随机研究。
Helicobacter. 2006 Dec;11(6):562-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2006.00459.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Sequential versus Standard Triple Therapy for First-Line Eradication: An Update.一线根除治疗的序贯疗法与标准三联疗法:最新进展
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;13(2):136. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13020136.
2
The Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Levofloxacin Quadruple Therapy for Eradication: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.左氧氟沙星四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效、安全性及耐受性:一项随机双盲临床试验
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Dec 6;2022:9794901. doi: 10.1155/2022/9794901. eCollection 2022.
3
Evidence based guidelines for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Korea 2020.
韩国 2020 年幽门螺杆菌感染治疗的循证指南。
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(4):807-838. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.701. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
4
Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Treatment of Infection in Korea 2020.2020 年韩国感染治疗循证指南。
Gut Liver. 2021 Mar 15;15(2):168-195. doi: 10.5009/gnl20288.
5
The In Vitro Activity of Essential Oils against Growth and Urease Activity.精油对生长和脲酶活性的体外活性。
Molecules. 2020 Jan 29;25(3):586. doi: 10.3390/molecules25030586.
6
Management of Antibiotic-Resistant Infection: Perspectives from Vietnam.抗生素耐药感染的管理:来自越南的观点。
Gut Liver. 2019 Sep 15;13(5):483-497. doi: 10.5009/gnl18137.
7
Bovine lactoferrin enhances the efficacy of levofloxacin-based triple therapy as first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: an in vitro and in vivo study.牛乳铁蛋白增强左氧氟沙星三联疗法作为幽门螺杆菌感染一线治疗的疗效:一项体外和体内研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Apr 1;74(4):1069-1077. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky510.
8
Levofloxacin based vs clarithromycin based sequential therapy in eradication; a randomized clinical trial.基于左氧氟沙星与基于克拉霉素的序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的随机临床试验
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2018 Winter;11(1):19-26.
9
Efficacy and Safety of the Triple Therapy Containing Ilaprazole, Levofloxacin, and Amoxicillin as First-Line Treatment in Infections.含艾普拉唑、左氧氟沙星和阿莫西林的三联疗法作为一线治疗感染的疗效和安全性
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:1654907. doi: 10.1155/2017/1654907. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
10
Levofloxacin or Clarithromycin-based quadruple regimens: what is the best alternative as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication in a country with high resistance rates for both antibiotics?基于左氧氟沙星或克拉霉素的四联疗法:在两种抗生素耐药率都很高的国家,作为根除幽门螺杆菌的一线治疗,哪种是最佳替代方案?
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb 15;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0589-6.