• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颅底病变调强放疗计划优化:剂量递增的实用课程解决方案。

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan optimisation for skull base lesions: practical class solutions for dose escalation.

机构信息

PeterMac Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010 May;22(4):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2010.02.002
PMID:20181465
Abstract

AIMS

To identify practical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning solutions when attempting dose escalation in the skull base.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty cases of skull base meningioma were re-planned using a variation of beam number (three, five, seven and nine), beam arrangement (coplanar vs non-coplanar) and multileaf collimator (MLC) width (2.5 mm vs 10 mm) to 60 Gy/30 fractions. Plan quality and planning target volume coverage was assessed using planning target volume V(95%), equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and integral dose.

RESULTS

Critical structures were maintained below clinical tolerance levels. The 2.5 mm MLC achieved an average improvement in V(95%) by 22.8% (P=0.0003), EUD by 3.7 Gy (P=0.002) and reduced the integral dose by 13.4 Gy (P=0.0001). V(95%) and the integral dose improved with five vs three beams and seven vs five beams, but did not change with nine vs seven beams. There was no effect of beam number on EUD. There was no difference in V(95%) (P=0.54), integral dose (P=0.44) or EUD (P=0.47) for beam arrangement used. Segments per plan increased by a factor of 1.5 with each addition of two beams to a plan, and by a factor of 2.5 for 2.5 mm MLC plans vs 10 mm MLC plans.

CONCLUSIONS

We present evidence-based planning solutions for skull base intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and show that 2.5 mm MLC and five to seven beams can achieve safe dose escalation up to 60 Gy. This must be balanced with an increase in segmentation, which will increase treatment times.

摘要

目的

在颅底尝试提高剂量时,确定实用的强度调制放疗计划解决方案。

材料与方法

对 20 例颅底脑膜瘤病例进行重新计划,分别采用不同的射束数量(3、5、7 和 9 个)、射束排列(共面与非共面)和多叶准直器(MLC)宽度(2.5mm 与 10mm),将剂量提升至 60Gy/30 次。采用计划靶区体积 V95%、等效均匀剂量(EUD)和积分剂量评估计划质量和计划靶区覆盖情况。

结果

关键结构均保持在临床耐受水平以下。2.5mm MLC 可使 V95%平均提高 22.8%(P=0.0003)、EUD 提高 3.7Gy(P=0.002),并降低积分剂量 13.4Gy(P=0.0001)。与 3 个射束相比,5 个和 7 个射束可使 V95%和积分剂量改善,但 9 个射束与 7 个射束相比无变化。射束数量对 EUD 无影响。射束排列对 V95%(P=0.54)、积分剂量(P=0.44)或 EUD(P=0.47)均无影响。在增加 2 个射束的情况下,每个计划的段数增加 1.5 倍,2.5mm MLC 计划与 10mm MLC 计划相比增加 2.5 倍。

结论

我们提出颅底强度调制放疗的循证计划解决方案,并表明 2.5mm MLC 和 5 至 7 个射束可安全地将剂量提升至 60Gy。但这必须与分割的增加相平衡,这会增加治疗时间。

相似文献

1
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan optimisation for skull base lesions: practical class solutions for dose escalation.颅底病变调强放疗计划优化:剂量递增的实用课程解决方案。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010 May;22(4):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
2
Skull base meningioma - comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning techniques using the moduleaf micro-multileaf collimator and helical tomotherapy.颅底脑膜瘤 - 使用模块 af 微多叶准直器和螺旋断层放疗的强度调制放疗计划技术比较。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010 Apr;22(3):179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
3
Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.调强放疗及叶片宽度对肝脏和肺部病变立体定向体部放疗的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Apr 1;61(5):1572-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.075.
4
Comparison of linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and tomotherapy treatment plans for skull-base tumors.基于直线加速器的分次立体定向放射治疗与断层放射治疗对头颈部肿瘤治疗计划的比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2006 Mar;78(3):313-21. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.01.005. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
5
Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.调强放射治疗中射束几何形状与强度图的同步优化
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jan 1;64(1):301-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.08.023. Epub 2005 Nov 14.
6
Dynamic intensity-modulated non-coplanar arc radiotherapy (INCA) for head and neck cancer.头颈部癌的动态调强非共面弧形放射治疗(INCA)
Radiother Oncol. 2006 Nov;81(2):151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 19.
7
Dose escalation in the radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer with aperture-based intensity modulation and photon beam energy optimization for non-preselected patients.基于孔径的调强放疗联合光子束能量优化用于非小细胞肺癌非预选患者的剂量递增研究
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jun;91(3):342-8. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.11.017. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
8
Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.基于放射生物学指标的螺旋断层放射治疗与基于多叶准直器的调强放射治疗的治疗计划比较
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jul 7;52(13):3817-36. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/011. Epub 2007 May 31.
9
Intensity modulated radiation therapy with multileaf collimators of different leaf widths: a comparison of achievable dose distributions.不同叶宽多叶准直器的调强放射治疗:可实现剂量分布的比较
Radiother Oncol. 2005 Apr;75(1):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.02.007. Epub 2005 Apr 18.
10
Dose conformation of intensity-modulated stereotactic photon beams, proton beams, and intensity-modulated proton beams for intracranial lesions.用于颅内病变的调强立体定向光子束、质子束和调强质子束的剂量适形
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 15;60(4):1314-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.212.

引用本文的文献

1
Three IMRT advanced planning tools: A multi-institutional side-by-side comparison.三种调强放疗(IMRT)先进计划工具:多机构并排比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Aug;20(8):65-77. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12679. Epub 2019 Jul 31.