Suppr超能文献

不注意盲视的“不注意”在哪里?

What's "inattentional" about inattentional blindness?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, 108 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE 19716-2577, United States.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2010 Dec;19(4):1102-4; discussion 1107-9. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.01.011. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

Abstract

In a recent commentary, Memmert critiqued claims that attentional misdirection is directly analogous to inattentional blindness (IB) and cautioned against assuming too close a similarity between the two phenomena. One important difference highlighted in his analysis is that most lab-based inductions of IB rely on the taxing of attention through a demanding primary task, whereas attentional misdirection typically involves simply the orchestration of spatial attention. The present commentary argues that, rather than reflecting a complete dissociation between IB and attentional misdirection, this difference highlights potential grounds for delineating mechanistically distinct forms of IB: spatial inattentional blindness, which stems from the covert misallocation of spatial attention, and central inattentional blindness, which stems from disruption or preoccupation of perceptual mechanisms that interface with higher-level processes such as working memory. Recognition of such distinctions can help situate theoretical understanding of IB more firmly within the context of the broader attention literature.

摘要

在最近的一篇评论中,Memmert 批评了注意力转移与非注意盲视(IB)直接类比的说法,并警告不要假设这两种现象过于相似。他的分析中突出的一个重要区别是,大多数基于实验室的 IB 诱导都依赖于通过要求高的主要任务来集中注意力,而注意力转移通常只涉及空间注意力的协调。本评论认为,这种差异并没有反映出 IB 和注意力转移之间的完全分离,而是突出了区分机制上不同形式的 IB 的潜在基础:空间性非注意盲视,源于空间注意力的隐性分配不当;以及中央性非注意盲视,源于与工作记忆等高级过程接口的知觉机制的中断或分心。认识到这些区别可以帮助将 IB 的理论理解更牢固地置于更广泛的注意力文献背景中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验