J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Apr;65(4):601-4. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq037. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
The accurate performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from animal sources and the correct presentation of the results is a complex matter. A review of the published literature revealed a number of recurring errors with regard to methodology, quality control, appropriate interpretive criteria, and calculation of MIC(50) and MIC(90) values. Although more subjective, there is also no consensus regarding the definition of multiresistance. This Editorial is intended to provide guidance to authors on how to avoid these frequently detected shortcomings.
准确地进行动物源细菌的抗菌药物敏感性测试和正确地呈现测试结果是一个复杂的问题。对已发表文献的回顾显示，在方法学、质量控制、适当的解释标准以及 MIC(50)和 MIC(90)值的计算方面存在一些反复出现的错误。尽管更主观，但对于多耐药性的定义也没有共识。本社论旨在为作者提供如何避免这些常见缺陷的指导。
