Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Bartholin Building, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
J Virol. 2010 May;84(9):4579-86. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02591-09. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
Interferons (IFNs) are induced as an initial response to viral infection after recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Here, we report that different PAMPs induce type I and III IFN expression at different ratios after mucosal administration in the vaginas of mice and that Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) stimulation evokes a particularly strong IFN-lambda response, which is essential for optimal antiviral protection. Depletion of CD11c(+) cells in vivo revealed that dendritic cells (DCs) in the vaginal epithelium are a key source of type I and III IFNs during herpes simplex virus infection and after specific stimulation of TLR9. A comparison of the signaling pathways activated by TLR9 and cytoplasmic PRRs, which induced lower levels of IFN-lambda, revealed that high-level induction of IFN-lambda correlated with strong activation of NF-kappaB p65. Inhibition of the NF-kappaB and interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) pathways with the NEMO-binding domain peptide and small interfering RNA (siRNA), respectively, revealed that transcription of the type III IFN genes was more dependent on the NF-kappaB pathway than that of the type I IFN genes, which relied more on the IRF system. Thus, the type I and III IFN genes are not induced through entirely identical pathways, which indicates differential expression of these two types of IFNs under certain conditions.
干扰素 (IFNs) 是在模式识别受体 (PRRs) 识别病原体相关分子模式 (PAMPs) 后,作为对病毒感染的初始反应而诱导产生的。在这里,我们报告说,不同的 PAMPs 在小鼠阴道黏膜给药后以不同的比例诱导 I 型和 III 型 IFN 的表达,并且 Toll 样受体 9 (TLR9) 刺激引发特别强烈的 IFN-λ 反应,这对于最佳抗病毒保护至关重要。体内 CD11c(+) 细胞耗竭表明,在单纯疱疹病毒感染期间和 TLR9 特异性刺激后,阴道上皮中的树突状细胞 (DC) 是 I 型和 III 型 IFNs 的关键来源。比较 TLR9 和细胞质 PRRs 激活的信号通路,这些通路诱导 IFN-λ 的水平较低,表明 IFN-λ 的高水平诱导与 NF-κB p65 的强烈激活相关。用 NEMO 结合域肽和小干扰 RNA (siRNA) 分别抑制 NF-κB 和干扰素调节因子 3 (IRF-3) 通路,揭示了 III 型 IFN 基因的转录更依赖于 NF-κB 通路,而 I 型 IFN 基因更依赖于 IRF 系统。因此,I 型和 III 型 IFN 基因不是通过完全相同的途径诱导的,这表明在某些条件下这两种类型的 IFN 的表达存在差异。