• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受华法林治疗的狼疮抗凝物患者中,凝血因子X和凝血因子II的活性水平并不总是一致的。

Factor X and factor II activity levels do not always agree in warfarin-treated lupus anticoagulant patients.

作者信息

Rosborough Terry K, Jacobsen Jennifer M, Shepherd Michele F

机构信息

Medical Education Department and Coagulation Laboratory, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407, USA.

出版信息

Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2010 Apr;21(3):242-4. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32833581a3.

DOI:10.1097/MBC.0b013e32833581a3
PMID:20182349
Abstract

Warfarin therapy is used in lupus anticoagulant patients with thrombosis and yet the prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR) in these patients can sometimes be falsely elevated. Both a PT-based factor II (FII) assay and a chromogenic, enzymatic factor X (CFX) assay have been used for monitoring when the INR may be artifactual. This study compared FII and CFX assays in lupus anticoagulant-positive and lupus anticoagulant-negative warfarin-treated patients in a cross-sectional study of samples from 21 lupus anticoagulant-positive and 19 lupus anticoagulant-negative outpatients. Plasma samples were simultaneously measured for FII and CFX and the ratio of FII/CFX was used to measure concordance. Compared with lupus anticoagulant-negative patients 14 of the 21 lupus anticoagulant-positive patients had lower FII/CFX ratios (P < 0.01). Three of the patients had ratios less than 0.6 indicating strong disagreement (P < 0.0001). The patient with the lowest FII/CFX ratio had evidence suggesting a specific antibody to FII. Another patient showed that the discordance between FII and CFX varied over time. The CFX assay in the laboratory was technically superior, more precise, and less costly. The CFX assay is preferred for warfarin therapy monitoring in lupus anticoagulant patients when INR artifacts are suspected.

摘要

华法林疗法用于患有血栓形成的狼疮抗凝物患者,但这些患者的凝血酶原时间(PT)/国际标准化比值(INR)有时可能会被错误地升高。当INR可能出现人为因素影响时,基于PT的凝血因子II(FII)检测和发色底物法、酶促凝血因子X(CFX)检测均已用于监测。本研究在一项横断面研究中,对21例狼疮抗凝物阳性和19例狼疮抗凝物阴性门诊患者的样本进行比较,这些患者均接受华法林治疗。同时检测血浆样本中的FII和CFX,并使用FII/CFX比值来衡量一致性。与狼疮抗凝物阴性患者相比,21例狼疮抗凝物阳性患者中有14例的FII/CFX比值较低(P<0.01)。其中3例患者的比值小于0.6,表明存在强烈分歧(P<0.0001)。FII/CFX比值最低的患者有证据表明存在针对FII的特异性抗体。另一名患者显示FII和CFX之间的不一致性随时间变化。实验室中的CFX检测在技术上更优越、更精确且成本更低。当怀疑存在INR人为因素影响时,CFX检测更适合用于狼疮抗凝物患者的华法林治疗监测。

相似文献

1
Factor X and factor II activity levels do not always agree in warfarin-treated lupus anticoagulant patients.在接受华法林治疗的狼疮抗凝物患者中,凝血因子X和凝血因子II的活性水平并不总是一致的。
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2010 Apr;21(3):242-4. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32833581a3.
2
Relationship between international normalized ratio values, vitamin K-dependent clotting factor levels and in vivo prothrombin activation during the early and steady phases of oral anticoagulant treatment.口服抗凝治疗早期和稳定期国际标准化比值、维生素K依赖凝血因子水平与体内凝血酶原激活之间的关系
Haematologica. 2002 Oct;87(10):1074-80.
3
Unreliability of international normalized ratio for monitoring warfarin therapy in patients with lupus anticoagulant.国际标准化比值在监测狼疮抗凝物患者华法林治疗中的不可靠性。
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Jul;24(7):838-42. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.9.838.36102.
4
Falsely elevated INRs in warfarin-treated patients with the lupus anticoagulant.华法林治疗的狼疮抗凝物患者国际标准化比值(INR)假性升高
WMJ. 2000 Jun;99(3):62-4, 43.
5
Warfarin does not interfere with lupus anticoagulant detection by dilute Russell's viper venom time.华法林不干扰通过稀释蝰蛇毒时间检测狼疮抗凝物。
Clin Lab. 2009;55(3-4):138-42.
6
Monitoring anticoagulation in patients with an unreliable prothrombin time/international normalized ratio: factor II versus chromogenic factor X testing.监测凝血酶原时间/国际标准化比值不可靠患者的抗凝情况:II 因子与显色法 X 因子检测对比
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2014 Apr;25(3):232-6. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000030.
7
Relationship between chromogenic factor X and international normalized ratio differs during early warfarin initiation compared with chronic warfarin administration.与华法林长期给药相比,在华法林起始治疗早期,显色因子X与国际标准化比值之间的关系有所不同。
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2009 Sep;20(6):433-5. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32832ca31f.
8
Warfarin monitoring in antiphospholipid syndrome and lupus anticoagulant.抗磷脂综合征和狼疮抗凝物中的华法林监测
Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Nov;48(11):1479-83. doi: 10.1177/1060028014546361. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
9
Comparison between CoaguChek S- and Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring anticoagulant therapy.用于监测抗凝治疗的CoaguChek S型与奥伦氏凝血酶原时间测定法的比较。
Thromb Res. 2004;114(2):83-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.04.010.
10
Comparison of a chromogenic factor X assay with international normalized ratio for monitoring oral anticoagulation therapy.用于监测口服抗凝治疗的显色法X因子检测与国际标准化比值的比较。
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2008 Sep;19(6):513-7. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e328304e066.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of thromboplastin reagents on monitoring INR in a patient with triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome: a case report.凝血活酶试剂对三阳性抗磷脂综合征患者国际标准化比值监测的影响:一例报告
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 31;16:1591029. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1591029. eCollection 2025.
2
Unresolved issues in the diagnosis and management of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome.血栓性抗磷脂综合征诊断与管理中的未解决问题。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025 Mar 7;9(2):102724. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102724. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
[Not Available].
[无可用内容]
J Vasc Bras. 2017 Apr-Jun;16(2):140-149. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.011416.
4
Clinical and Prognostic Significance of Lupus Anticoagulant Measurement in Patients With Lung Cancer.狼疮抗凝物检测在肺癌患者中的临床及预后意义
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Dec;16(6):1006-1013. doi: 10.1177/1533034617714150. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
5
Rivaroxaban in antiphospholipid syndrome (RAPS) protocol: a prospective, randomized controlled phase II/III clinical trial of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, with or without SLE.利伐沙班用于抗磷脂综合征(RAPS)的方案:一项关于利伐沙班与华法林对比治疗血栓形成性抗磷脂综合征患者(无论是否合并系统性红斑狼疮)的前瞻性、随机对照II/III期临床试验。
Lupus. 2015 Sep;24(10):1087-94. doi: 10.1177/0961203315581207. Epub 2015 May 4.
6
Variability in the international normalised ratio (INR) in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and positive lupus anticoagulant: should the INR targets be higher?抗磷脂综合征且狼疮抗凝物阳性患者国际标准化比值(INR)的变异性:INR 目标值应更高吗?
BMJ Case Rep. 2015 Apr 9;2015:bcr2014209013. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-209013.
7
Monitoring anticoagulation in patients with an unreliable prothrombin time/international normalized ratio: factor II versus chromogenic factor X testing.监测凝血酶原时间/国际标准化比值不可靠患者的抗凝情况:II 因子与显色法 X 因子检测对比
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2014 Apr;25(3):232-6. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000030.