Zhou Jihao, Qin Zhaohui, Sara Quinney K, Kim Seongho, Wang Zhiping, Hall Stephen D, Li Lang
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
J Biopharm Stat. 2009 Jul;19(4):641-57. doi: 10.1080/10543400902964084.
Model-based drug-drug interaction (DDI) is an important in-silico tool to assess the in vivo consequences of in vitro DDI. Before its general application to new drug compounds, the DDI model is always established from known interaction data. For the first time, tests for difference and equivalent tests are implemented to compare reported and model-base simulated DDI (log AUCR) in the sample mean and variance. The biases and predictive confidence interval coverage probabilities are introduced to assess the DDI prediction performance. Sample size and power guidelines are developed for DDI model simulations. These issues have never been discussed in trial simulation studies to investigate DDI prediction. A ketoconazole (KETO)/midazolam (MDZ) example is employed to demonstrate these statistical methods. Based on published KETO and MDZ pharmacokinetics data and their in vitro inhibition rate constant data, current model-based DDI prediction underpredicts the area under concentration curve ratio (AUCR) and its between-subject variance compared to the reported study.
基于模型的药物相互作用(DDI)是评估体外DDI体内后果的一种重要的计算机模拟工具。在将其普遍应用于新的药物化合物之前,DDI模型总是根据已知的相互作用数据建立。首次实施差异检验和等效性检验,以比较样本均值和方差中报告的和基于模型模拟的DDI(log AUCR)。引入偏差和预测置信区间覆盖概率来评估DDI预测性能。为DDI模型模拟制定了样本量和效能指南。在研究DDI预测的试验模拟研究中,从未讨论过这些问题。采用酮康唑(KETO)/咪达唑仑(MDZ)的例子来演示这些统计方法。基于已发表的KETO和MDZ药代动力学数据及其体外抑制速率常数数据,与报告的研究相比,当前基于模型的DDI预测低估了浓度曲线下面积比(AUCR)及其受试者间方差。