Donovan J Mark, Elliott Michael R, Heitjan Daniel F
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104-6021, USA.
J Biopharm Stat. 2006 May;16(3):343-56. doi: 10.1080/10543400600609445.
Because power is primarily determined by the number of events in event-based clinical trials, the timing for interim or final analysis of data is often determined based on the accrual of events during the course of the study. Thus, it is of interest to predict early and accurately the time of a landmark interim or terminating event. Existing Bayesian methods may be used to predict the date of the landmark event, based on current enrollment, event, and loss to follow-up, if treatment arms are known. This work extends these methods to the case where the treatment arms are masked by using a parametric mixture model with a known mixture proportion. Posterior simulation using the mixture model is compared with methods assuming a single population. Comparison of the mixture model with the single-population approach shows that with few events, these approaches produce substantially different results and that these results converge as the prediction time is closer to the landmark event. Simulations show that the mixture model with diffuse priors can have better coverage probabilities for the prediction interval than the nonmixture models if a treatment effect is present.
由于在基于事件的临床试验中,效能主要由事件数量决定,因此数据的中期或最终分析时间通常根据研究过程中的事件累积情况来确定。因此,尽早且准确地预测标志性中期或终止事件的时间很有意义。如果已知治疗组,现有的贝叶斯方法可用于根据当前入组、事件和失访情况预测标志性事件的日期。这项工作将这些方法扩展到使用具有已知混合比例的参数混合模型来掩盖治疗组的情况。将使用混合模型的后验模拟与假设单一总体的方法进行比较。混合模型与单总体方法的比较表明,在事件较少时,这些方法会产生截然不同的结果,并且随着预测时间接近标志性事件,这些结果会趋于一致。模拟表明,如果存在治疗效果,具有扩散先验的混合模型在预测区间方面可能比非混合模型具有更好的覆盖概率。