Taylor Nik, Signal Tania D
Department of Sociology, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2009;12(4):345-59. doi: 10.1080/10888700903163658.
The success of welfare legislation for nonhuman animals rests upon primary producer compliance that, in turn, is affected by public willingness to pay (WTP) for such initiatives. Although the topic of the welfare of animals on farms (and relevant legislation) is becoming increasingly important to the Australian public, there remain relatively few recent assessments of the variables that may affect WTP and, therefore, support initiatives aimed at improving the welfare of animals living on farms. This study surveyed 1,224 community members in Queensland, Australia. The study assessed respondents' self-rated knowledge of, and concern regarding, farm animal welfare. In addition, the survey asked respondents how much more they would be prepared to pay for animal-based products to ensure that they came from a source where the Five Freedoms were met. Although self-rated knowledge and level of concern were found to affect WTP, the study found only concern for farm animal welfare actually predicted consumer behavior. Further analyses showed a potential confound between knowledge levels and locality. This article discusses the implications of this for future initiatives to increase WTP.
非人类动物福利立法的成功取决于初级生产者的遵守情况,而这又受到公众对这类举措的支付意愿(WTP)的影响。尽管农场动物福利(及相关立法)这一话题对澳大利亚公众而言愈发重要,但近期对可能影响支付意愿的变量的评估相对较少,因此也缺乏对旨在改善农场动物福利举措的支持。本研究对澳大利亚昆士兰州的1224名社区成员进行了调查。该研究评估了受访者对农场动物福利的自我评定知识及关注程度。此外,调查询问受访者愿意为动物制品多支付多少钱,以确保这些产品来自符合“五大自由”的来源。尽管发现自我评定知识和关注程度会影响支付意愿,但该研究发现只有对农场动物福利的关注实际上能够预测消费者行为。进一步分析表明,知识水平与所在地之间可能存在混淆因素。本文讨论了这对未来提高支付意愿举措的影响。