Weiss Emily, Gramann Shannon
ASPCA Shelter Research and Development, Benton, Kansas, USA.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2009;12(4):360-70. doi: 10.1080/10888700903163674.
Nonhuman animal welfare professionals have been critical of adoption programs that do not charge a fee for adult cats, despite the high euthanasia rate for cats due to a reported lack of homes. The argument against the free cat adoptions cites a devaluation of the cat, which may affect the adopter's perceived value of the cat and subsequent care. It may also attract low-income adopters who are perceived as unable to fulfill the financial responsibility of acting as caregiver (owner) of a companion animal (pet). This study examined adopters' attachment to their cats in relation to the payment or waiver of an adoption fee using the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale and perception of the shelter. No significant differences were found between groups on either measure. Programs such as this create an opportunity to positively affect cats in animal shelters by finding more homes; programs such as this also affect cat overpopulation by putting more altered cats into the community.
非人类动物福利专业人士一直批评那些不对成年猫收取领养费用的领养计划,尽管据报道由于缺乏收养家庭,猫的安乐死率很高。反对免费领养猫的观点认为,这会贬低猫的价值,这可能会影响领养者对猫的认知价值以及后续的照料。这也可能会吸引那些被认为无力承担作为伴侣动物(宠物)照料者(主人)的经济责任的低收入领养者。本研究使用列克星敦宠物依恋量表,考察了领养者对其猫的依恋程度与支付或免除领养费用以及对收容所的认知之间的关系。在这两项测量中,各群体之间均未发现显著差异。这样的计划通过找到更多收养家庭,为积极影响动物收容所中的猫创造了机会;这样的计划还通过将更多绝育的猫放归社区,也对猫的数量过多问题产生影响。