Attach Hum Dev. 2009 Nov;11(6):557-61. doi: 10.1080/14616730903282514.
The importance of James Robertson's work in changing the hospital conditions for young children is widely acknowledged but disputed by van der Horst and van der Veer (2009), although they presented evidence supporting his influence, they also presented considerable evidence showing that others were ignored, including writers in The Lancet and the British Medical Journal. van der Horst and van der Veer presented a muddled picture by failing to understand how the work of James Robertson influenced a wide range of people, opened up the debate and, through the Platt Report, gave parents the authority and confidence to challenge hospitals and stay with their young children. James Robertson's 1952 film "a Two-year-old Goes to Hospital" provided the 'visual communication to pierce defences as the spoken word cannot do'. This film continues to be widely used today in teaching about young children.
詹姆斯·罗伯逊（James Robertson）改变儿童医院条件的工作的重要性得到了广泛认可，但范德霍斯特（van der Horst）和范德维尔（van der Veer）（2009 年）对此提出了争议，尽管他们提出了支持其影响力的证据，但也提出了相当多的证据表明，其他人被忽视了，包括《柳叶刀》和《英国医学杂志》的撰稿人。范德霍斯特和范德维尔（van der Veer）没有理解詹姆斯·罗伯逊（James Robertson）的工作如何影响了广泛的人群，从而使局面变得混乱，也没有理解《普拉特报告》（Platt Report）如何赋予父母挑战医院并陪伴他们年幼孩子的权力和信心。詹姆斯·罗伯逊（James Robertson）1952 年的电影《两岁的孩子去医院》（"a Two-year-old Goes to Hospital"）提供了“视觉交流，以打破防御，而不是口头语言”。这部电影至今仍在广泛用于幼儿教育。
