为何我们无法求同存异：对罗伯逊、麦吉利和林赛评论的回应
Why we disagree to disagree: a reply to commentaries by Robertson and McGilly, and Lindsay.
机构信息
Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Attach Hum Dev. 2009 Nov;11(6):569-72. doi: 10.1080/14616730903282522.
PMID:20183558
Abstract
In this contribution the authors reply to two commentaries - published in this issue - on their earlier paper discussing the changing attitudes towards the care of children in hospital in the UK between 1940 and 1970. They argue that the work of Robertson and Bowlby was indeed very important in bringing about these changes, but stand firm that the work of Robertson and Bowlby was not new or decisive.
摘要
在这篇文章中，作者回复了两篇评论文章——发表在本期杂志上——对他们早期论文的评论，该论文讨论了 1940 年至 1970 年间英国对医院中儿童护理态度的变化。他们认为，罗伯逊和鲍尔比的工作确实在带来这些变化方面非常重要，但他们坚决认为，罗伯逊和鲍尔比的工作并不是新的或决定性的。
Zotero 插件