Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2010 Jan;58(1):82-101. doi: 10.1080/00207140903310865.
This descriptive study evaluates the hypnoanalgesic experience's effect on participants' hypnotizability and opinions about hypnosis and identifies factors associated with hypnotizability. Hypnotizability was assessed using the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form A in 290 women 1 month after their participation in a randomized clinical trial evaluating hypnotic intervention for pain/anxiety versus standard care during pregnancy termination. Opinions were collected before and after the intervention. The regression model describing hypnotizability (F = 13.55; p < .0001; R(2) = 0.20) retained 5 variables but not the intervention group. The variable explaining most of total variance (62.9%) was the level of perceived automaticity/involuntariness. Opinions about hypnosis were modified by the hypnotic experience compared to standard care but were not associated with hypnotizability. Exposure to hypnoanalgesia did not influence hypnotizability but modifies significantly the opinions about hypnosis. Consistent with previous findings, perceived automaticity appears to best predict hypnotizability.
这项描述性研究评估了催眠镇痛体验对参与者催眠能力的影响以及他们对催眠的看法，并确定了与催眠能力相关的因素。在 290 名女性参与评估催眠干预对妊娠终止期间疼痛/焦虑与标准护理的随机临床试验 1 个月后，使用斯坦福催眠易感性量表：A 型评估催眠能力。在干预前后收集意见。描述催眠能力的回归模型（F = 13.55；p <.0001；R(2) = 0.20）保留了 5 个变量，但不包括干预组。解释总方差最大的变量（62.9%）是感知的自动性/非自愿性水平。与标准护理相比，催眠体验会改变对催眠的看法，但与催眠能力无关。接触催眠镇痛并不会影响催眠能力，但会显著改变对催眠的看法。与之前的研究结果一致，感知的自动性似乎是预测催眠能力的最佳指标。
