Suppr超能文献

实施以匹利卡明为基础的患者自控镇痛(PCA)作为晚期引产疼痛控制的护理标准:一项从患者角度进行的前瞻性队列研究。

Implementation of a piritramide based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) as a standard of care for pain control in late abortion induction: A prospective cohort study from a patient perspective.

作者信息

Tascón Padrón L, Emrich N L A, Strizek B, Gass A, Link C, Hilbert T, Klaschik S, Meissner W, Gembruch U, Jiménez Cruz J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Oct 12;20:100251. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100251. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the implementation of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with piritramide using an automatic pump system under routine conditions is effective to reduce pain in late abortion inductions.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Patients requiring medically indicated abortion induction from 14 weeks of pregnancy onwards between July 2019 and July 2020 at the department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine of the Bonn University Hospital in Germany.

METHODS

Evaluation of pain management after implementation of a PCA system compared with previous nurse-controlled tramadol-based standard under routine conditions. Patients answered a validated pain questionnaire and requirement of rescue analgesics was assessed. Pain intensity and satisfaction were measured on a ten-point numeric rating scale. Main Outcome Measure Maximal pain intensity.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included. Patients using Piritramide-PCA complained of higher pain sores than those in the standard group (6.90 (± 2.34) vs. 4.83 (± 2.87), (p < 0.05)). In both groups the level of satisfaction with the analgesia received was comparable (8.00 (± 2.45) vs 7.67 (± 2.62), (p = 0.7)). Patients in the PCA group suffered more nausea (63.2 % vs 30 % respectively, OR 4.0, 95 % CI 1.05-15.20, p < 0.05) and expressed more the desire for more analgesic support compared to the control group (OR 5.7 (1-33.25), p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Women with abortion induction after 14 weeks of gestation suffer from relevant severe pain, which requires adequate therapy. However, addition of PCA does not seem to bring any advantage in patients undergoing this procedure.

摘要

目的

评估在常规条件下使用自动泵系统进行匹利卡明患者自控镇痛(PCA)是否能有效减轻晚期引产时的疼痛。

研究设计

前瞻性观察队列研究。

研究地点

2019年7月至2020年7月期间,德国波恩大学医院妇产科和产前医学科中,怀孕14周及以上需要药物引产的患者。

方法

在常规条件下,将实施PCA系统后的疼痛管理与先前基于曲马多的护士控制标准进行比较。患者回答一份经过验证的疼痛问卷,并评估急救镇痛药的需求。疼痛强度和满意度采用十点数字评分量表进行测量。主要观察指标为最大疼痛强度。

结果

纳入40例患者。使用匹利卡明PCA的患者比标准组患者抱怨的疼痛更严重(6.90(±2.34)对4.83(±2.87),(p<0.05))。两组对所接受镇痛的满意度水平相当(8.00(±2.45)对7.67(±2.62),(p=0.7))。与对照组相比,PCA组患者恶心症状更多(分别为63.2%对30%,OR 4.0,95%CI 1.05-15.20,p<0.05),且表示更希望获得更多镇痛支持(OR 5.7(1-33.25),p=0.05)。

结论

妊娠14周后引产的女性会遭受严重疼痛,需要适当治疗。然而,在接受该手术的患者中添加PCA似乎没有任何优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12e1/10590719/4276cff843d2/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验