[A comparative study of the hepatic transit time (HTT) of different ultrasound contrast agents in patients with liver metastases and healthy controls].

PURPOSE

Liver metastases lead to a shortening of the HTT of an echo enhancer. Studies using SonoVue™ also showed a shortening of the HTT in healthy controls. Hence the HTT depends on the applied contrast agent. We examined whether the HTT of SonoVue™, Luminity™ und Levovist™ is useful to discriminate between patients with and without liver metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared the arteriovenous HTT of Levovist™, Sonovue™ und Luminity™ in 20 patients with liver metastases and in 15 controls. An Acuson Sequoia™ ultrasound system was used. The HTT results from the difference of the arrival time of the microbubbles in the hepatic artery and a hepatic vein.

RESULTS

Using Levovist™ six patients and three controls had to be excluded from further analysis. The arrival time was undetectable. The mean HTT values in healthy controls were: Levovsit™ 14.75 sec (SD ± 2.53 sec), SonoVue™ 9.27 sec (SD ± 2.41 sec) and Luminity™ 9.2 sec (SD ± 2.34 sec). In patients the mean HTT values were: Levovist™ 9.89 sec (SD ± 1.04 sec), SonoVue™ 6.28 sec (SD ± 2.41 sec) and Luminity™ 6.33 sec (SD ± 1.37 sec). Using a cut off of 8 sec for SonoVue™ and Luminity™, the sensitivity to exclude liver metastases was 75% and 80%.

CONCLUSION

The mean HTT values of all contrast agents were shorter in patients. Levovist™ showed a longer HTT in patients and controls than Luminity™ and SonoVue™. Levovist™ showed the best separation between patients and controls but some patients and controls had to be excluded. The HTT could still be a useful tool to exclude liver metastases but the HTT depends on the contrast agent and the applied contrast technique.