Tissue Injury Repair Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jun;13(6):708-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02243.x. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Recent meta-analyses have suggested that mechanical bowel preparation is not beneficial in patients undergoing colorectal resection. This study aimed to assess current surgical practice in the UK.
Three hundred and ninety-eight members of the Association of Coloproctology of GB & Ireland were invited to complete an online survey to ascertain their current practice for bowel preparation.
One hundred and ninety-nine surgeons completed the survey, of whom 95 (48%) routinely performed laparoscopic resection. The proportions using full bowel preparation for open vs laparoscopic surgery were, respectively, 9.5%vs 16.8% for right hemicolectomy, 43.4%vs 40.2% for left hemicolectomy, 20.5%vs 22.5% for an abdominoperineal resection and 72.2%vs 63.6% for low anterior resection. Among the surgeons who participated, 13.6% changed their practice between doing the same procedure open and laparoscopically, 76% of surgeons routinely defunctioned a low anterior resection. Of these, 22% did not feel that full bowel preparation was necessary before formation of an ileostomy.
The study demonstrates that a large proportion of patients still receive full bowel preparation despite recent advice to the contrary.
最近的荟萃分析表明,机械性肠道准备对接受结直肠切除术的患者无益。本研究旨在评估英国目前的手术实践。
邀请 398 名英国和爱尔兰结直肠外科学会成员完成在线调查,以确定他们目前的肠道准备实践情况。
199 名外科医生完成了调查,其中 95 名(48%)常规进行腹腔镜切除术。开放手术与腹腔镜手术相比,全肠道准备的比例分别为右半结肠切除术为 9.5%vs16.8%、左半结肠切除术为 43.4%vs40.2%、经腹会阴切除术为 20.5%vs22.5%、低位前切除术为 72.2%vs63.6%。在参与的外科医生中,13.6%的人在同一手术中从开放转为腹腔镜操作时改变了他们的做法,76%的外科医生常规对低位前切除术进行预防性造口。其中,22%的人认为在形成回肠造口术前不需要进行全肠道准备。
该研究表明,尽管最近有相反的建议,但仍有很大一部分患者接受全肠道准备。