Suppr超能文献

体式显微镜下通过计算机断层摄影术对邻面龋的检测准确性。

Detection accuracy of in vitro approximal caries by cone beam computed tomography images.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, #22 Zhongguancun Nandajie, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100081, China.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Aug;79(2):e24-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.063. Epub 2010 Feb 24.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of approximal carious lesions among five CBCT systems and to assess the effect of detector types employed by different CBCT systems on the accuracy of approximal caries diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine extracted non-cavitated human permanent teeth were employed in the study. Seven observers evaluated 78 approximal surfaces of the teeth with respect to caries by the images from the following five CBCT systems: (1) NewTom 9000; (2) Accuitomo 3DX; (3) Kodak 9000 3D; (4) ProMax 3D; and (5) DCT PRO, respectively. The lesions were validated by histological examination. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (A(z)) was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

Microscopy of approximal surfaces found 47.4% sound, 39.8% enamel and 12.8% dentin lesions. The differences of A(z) values among the five CBCT systems were not statistically significant (p=0.348). No significant difference was found between the two detector types of CBCT systems (p=0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

The five CBCT systems employed in the study showed no significant difference in the in vitro approximal caries detection. Neither the detector nor the FOV employed by the CBCT systems has an impact on the detection accuracy of approximal caries.

摘要

目的

评估 5 种 CBCT 系统中邻面龋损的诊断准确性,并评估不同 CBCT 系统所采用的探测器类型对邻面龋诊断准确性的影响。

材料与方法

本研究使用 39 颗离体未龋坏的人恒牙。7 名观察者分别使用以下 5 种 CBCT 系统(1)NewTom 9000;(2)Accuitomo 3DX;(3)Kodak 9000 3D;(4)ProMax 3D;(5)DCT PRO 的图像评估 78 个牙齿的近中面龋损情况。通过组织学检查验证病变。使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(A(z))评估诊断准确性。

结果

近中面显微镜下发现 47.4%为正常,39.8%为釉质病变,12.8%为牙本质病变。5 种 CBCT 系统的 A(z) 值差异无统计学意义(p=0.348)。CBCT 系统的两种探测器类型之间无显著差异(p=0.47)。

结论

本研究中使用的 5 种 CBCT 系统在体外邻面龋检测方面无显著差异。CBCT 系统所采用的探测器或视野均不会影响邻面龋的检测准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验