Diabetes Centre, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1169-72. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1758. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
To investigate the effects of continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) compared with subcutaneous insulin on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and treatment satisfaction, and to perform a cost analysis in type 1 diabetes.
We used an open-label, prospective, crossover, randomized, 16-month study (N = 24). HRQOL and patient satisfaction were assessed with questionnaires (the 36-item short-form health survey [SF-36], the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index [WHO-5], and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [DTSQ]). Direct costs of CIPII and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) were compared.
Questionnaire scores were higher with CIPII than with subcutaneous therapy. Yearly direct pump- and procedure-associated costs for CIPII were estimated at 10,910 euroscompared with 4,810 euros for CSII.
Apart from improving glycemic control, CIPII improved HRQOL and treatment satisfaction compared with subcutaneous insulin. Direct pump- and procedure-associated costs are considerably higher for CIPII, however.
研究持续腹腔内胰岛素输注(CIPII)与皮下胰岛素相比对 1 型糖尿病患者健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和治疗满意度的影响,并进行成本分析。
我们采用了一项开放标签、前瞻性、交叉、随机、16 个月的研究(N=24)。使用问卷评估 HRQOL 和患者满意度(36 项简短健康调查[SF-36]、世界卫生组织五幸福感指数[WHO-5]和糖尿病治疗满意度问卷[DTSQ])。比较了 CIPII 和连续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)的直接成本。
与皮下治疗相比,CIPII 的问卷评分更高。CIPII 的年度直接泵和程序相关成本估计为 10910 欧元,而 CSII 为 4810 欧元。
除了改善血糖控制外,CIPII 与皮下胰岛素相比还改善了 HRQOL 和治疗满意度。然而,CIPII 的直接泵和程序相关成本要高得多。