• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干预措施对成年慢性病患者家庭治疗效果的影响:一项荟萃分析。

Effects of interventions involving the family in the treatment of adult patients with chronic physical diseases: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic and General Internal Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. mechthild.hartmann @ med.uni-heidelberg.de

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom. 2010;79(3):136-48. doi: 10.1159/000286958. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1159/000286958
PMID:20185970
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Families can have considerable influence on the health of a patient with a chronic physical disease, and attempts have been made to optimise treatment by involving family members. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess the effects of family-oriented interventions on adults with chronic physical diseases.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomised clinical trials that have evaluated the effects of family-based interventions for adult patients compared to standard treatment. Interventions were classified as psychoeducation or addressing family relationships. The outcomes studied were the patient's physical and mental health and the health of the family members. The effect sizes were calculated as Hedges' g and combined using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Fifty-two relevant randomised controlled trials (including 8,896 patients) were extracted. The main disease groups were cardiovascular diseases including stroke, cancer and arthritis. Meta-analysis showed that family involvement resulted in significantly better health than standard treatment for all outcomes. The mean overall effect sizes were 0.32 for the patients' physical health, 0.28 for the patients' mental health and 0.35 for the family members' health. Overall, the effects were not large, but they were broad, significant and stable over a long period of time. There was a tendency towards higher effects in favour of relationship-focused family interventions compared to educational interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychosocial interventions involving family members in the treatment of chronic physical diseases have positive effects on the health outcome for both the patient and his/her family. Further high-quality research is necessary to investigate differential effects.

摘要

背景

家庭对患有慢性躯体疾病的患者的健康有很大影响,因此人们尝试通过让家庭成员参与来优化治疗效果。本荟萃分析旨在系统评估以家庭为导向的干预措施对患有慢性躯体疾病的成年人的影响。

方法

系统检索了评估家庭为基础的干预措施与标准治疗相比对成年患者影响的随机临床试验。干预措施分为教育或处理家庭关系。研究的结果是患者的身心健康和家庭成员的健康。使用随机效应模型计算效应量作为 Hedges'g。

结果

提取了 52 项相关的随机对照试验(包括 8896 名患者)。主要疾病组包括心血管疾病,包括中风、癌症和关节炎。荟萃分析显示,与标准治疗相比,家庭参与可显著改善所有结局的健康状况。患者身体健康的总体平均效应大小为 0.32,心理健康为 0.28,家庭成员健康为 0.35。总体而言,这些影响虽然不大,但广泛、显著且稳定,持续时间长。与教育干预相比,以关系为重点的家庭干预倾向于产生更高的效果。

结论

在治疗慢性躯体疾病时,让家庭成员参与心理社会干预对患者及其家庭的健康结果有积极影响。需要进一步开展高质量的研究来探讨差异影响。

相似文献

1
Effects of interventions involving the family in the treatment of adult patients with chronic physical diseases: a meta-analysis.干预措施对成年慢性病患者家庭治疗效果的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Psychother Psychosom. 2010;79(3):136-48. doi: 10.1159/000286958. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
2
Is it beneficial to involve a family member? A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for chronic illness.让家庭成员参与其中是否有益?一项关于慢性病心理社会干预的荟萃分析。
Health Psychol. 2004 Nov;23(6):599-611. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.6.599.
3
The effect of chronic illness on the psychological health of family members.慢性病对家庭成员心理健康的影响。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2003 Mar;6(1):13-22.
4
[Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary health care and outpatient community settings].[改善初级卫生保健和门诊社区环境中糖尿病管理的干预措施]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Jan 28;164(5):607-9.
5
Quality of life and coping strategies among lung transplant candidates and their family caregivers.肺移植候选者及其家庭照料者的生活质量与应对策略
Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(10):2321-32. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.001. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
6
[The effect on family members of treating home-hospitalized patients].[治疗居家住院患者对家庭成员的影响]
Harefuah. 2001 May;140(5):386-91, 455.
7
The effectiveness and active ingredients of mutual support groups for family caregivers of people with psychotic disorders: a literature review.支持精神障碍患者家庭照顾者的互助小组的效果和有效成分:文献综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Dec;46(12):1604-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 May 28.
8
Meta-analysis of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛心理干预的荟萃分析。
Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;26(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.1.1.
9
Can addressing family relationships improve outcomes in chronic disease? Report of the National Working Group on Family-Based Interventions in Chronic Disease.改善家庭关系能否改善慢性病的治疗效果?慢性病家庭干预全国工作组报告。
J Fam Pract. 2000 Jun;49(6):561-6.
10
The development of an evidence-based physical self-management rehabilitation programme for cancer survivors.为癌症幸存者制定基于证据的身体自我管理康复计划。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 May;71(2):169-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.027. Epub 2008 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a Family-Based Self-Management Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Family Doctor Contract Services: A Community-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.针对接受家庭医生签约服务的2型糖尿病患者的家庭自我管理干预措施的有效性:一项基于社区的随机对照试验。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251330384. doi: 10.1177/21501319251330384. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
2
Observational protocol on neuropsychological disorders in cardiovascular disease for holistic prevention and treatment.心血管疾病神经心理障碍整体防治的观察方案
Future Cardiol. 2025 May;21(6):349-358. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2483155. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
3
Comparison of the impact of type 1 and type 2 diabetes on quality of life of families of patients: A UK cross-sectional study.
1型和2型糖尿病对患者家庭生活质量影响的比较:一项英国横断面研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Feb;27(2):652-662. doi: 10.1111/dom.16058. Epub 2024 Nov 24.
4
Partnership and relationship happiness in endometriosis related chronic pelvic pain: a multicenter case-control study.子宫内膜异位症相关性慢性盆腔疼痛中的伴侣关系与幸福感:一项多中心病例对照研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 14;15:1382067. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382067. eCollection 2024.
5
Flexibly Incorporating the Dyad into Psychosocial Intervention: Considerations for Neuropalliative Care.将对偶关系灵活纳入心理社会干预:神经姑息治疗的考虑因素。
Semin Neurol. 2024 Oct;44(5):559-566. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791568. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
6
Design of Digital Mental Health Platforms for Family Member Cocompletion: Scoping Review.数字心理健康平台家庭成员共完成设计:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 3;26:e49431. doi: 10.2196/49431.
7
Videoconference-delivered group Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management for ME/CFS patients who present with severe PEM: A randomized controlled trial.针对出现严重运动后不适(PEM)的肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)患者,通过视频会议进行团体认知行为压力管理:一项随机对照试验。
Fatigue. 2024;12(2):101-122. doi: 10.1080/21641846.2024.2306801. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
8
Improving foot self-care in people with diabetes in Ghana: A development and feasibility randomised trial of a context appropriate, family-orientated diabetic footcare intervention.提高加纳糖尿病患者足部自我护理的能力:一项针对特定情境、以家庭为导向的糖尿病足部护理干预措施的发展和可行性随机试验。
PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0302385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302385. eCollection 2024.
9
Effectiveness of a videoconferencing group-based dyad acceptance and commitment therapy on the quality of life of chronic heart failure patients and their family caregivers: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于视频会议的双人小组接受与承诺疗法对慢性心力衰竭患者及其家庭照顾者生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0298178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298178. eCollection 2024.
10
Decision regret of cancer patients after radiotherapy: results from a cross-sectional observational study at a large tertiary cancer center in Germany.癌症患者放疗后的决策后悔:德国一家大型癌症中心的横断面观察研究结果。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar 28;150(3):167. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05638-0.