Department of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Mar;31(3):601-6. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22085.
To review magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and secretin stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) findings of patients with suspected chronic pancreatitis and compare them with endoscopic pancreatic function testing (ePFT).
MRI and S-MRCP findings of 36 patients with clinically suspected chronic pancreatitis were reviewed. Baseline ductal changes, duodenal filling grades, and pancreatic duct caliber change (PDC) on S-MRCP, mean values of pancreatic anteroposterior (AP) diameter, signal intensity ratio (SIR) between pancreas and the spleen on T1-weighted fat saturated images, and arterial to venous (A/V) enhancement ratios were compared between groups of normal and abnormal pancreatic exocrine function determined by ePFT.
All patients (n = 24) with normal ePFT (HCO(3) >80 mEq/L) had grade 3 normal duodenal filling. Patients with abnormal ePFT (HCO(3) <80 mEq/L) (n = 12) had grade 1 (n = 1) and grade 2 (n = 11) diminished duodenal filling (P < 0.0001). PDC was 1.51 in the normal ePFT group versus 1.27 in the abnormal ePFT group (P = 0.01). No significant differences were found in terms of mean pancreatic AP diameter (21.8 vs. 19.8 cm), SIR (1.59 vs. 1.44), and A/V (1.08 vs. 1.01) between groups of normal/abnormal pancreatic exocrine function.
Despite discrepancies between pancreatic exocrine function and the findings on standard MRI/MRCP, the S-MRCP findings are comparable to ePFT in the evaluation of chronic pancreatitis.
回顾怀疑患有慢性胰腺炎患者的磁共振成像(MRI)和促胰液素刺激磁共振胰胆管成像(S-MRCP)结果,并将其与内镜胰功能检测(ePFT)进行比较。
回顾了 36 例临床怀疑患有慢性胰腺炎患者的 MRI 和 S-MRCP 结果。比较了 S-MRCP 时基础胰管变化、十二指肠充盈分级和胰管口径变化(PDC)、胰腺前后径(AP)的平均值、T1 加权脂肪饱和图像上胰腺与脾脏的信号强度比(SIR)以及动脉到静脉(A/V)增强比在 ePFT 确定的正常和异常胰腺外分泌功能组之间的差异。
所有(n=24)ePFT 正常(HCO3>80 mEq/L)的患者均有 3 级正常十二指肠充盈。ePFT 异常(HCO3<80 mEq/L)的患者(n=12)有 1 级(n=1)和 11 级(n=11)减弱的十二指肠充盈(P<0.0001)。正常 ePFT 组的 PDC 为 1.51,异常 ePFT 组为 1.27(P=0.01)。正常/异常胰腺外分泌功能组之间的胰腺 AP 直径平均值(21.8 与 19.8 cm)、SIR(1.59 与 1.44)和 A/V(1.08 与 1.01)均无显著差异。
尽管胰腺外分泌功能与标准 MRI/MRCP 的结果存在差异,但 S-MRCP 的结果在评估慢性胰腺炎方面可与 ePFT 相媲美。