Suppr超能文献

安得拉邦眼病研究中成年城乡居民原发性青光眼的患病率及危险因素。

Prevalence and risk factors for primary glaucomas in adult urban and rural populations in the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study.

机构信息

L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy campus, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2010 Jul;117(7):1352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.006. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the prevalence of and risk factors for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) in urban and rural populations in the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study.

DESIGN

A population-based, cross-sectional study using a stratified, random, cluster, and systematic sampling strategy.

PARTICIPANTS

Between 1996 and 2000, participants from 94 clusters in 1 urban and 3 rural areas representative of the population were included.

METHODS

We performed a detailed eye examination, including applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and dilated fundus evaluation after ruling out risk of angle closure. Humphrey threshold 24-2 visual fields were performed when indicated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Glaucoma was diagnosed and categorized using International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology criteria. The prevalence and risk factors for POAG and PACG in subjects aged > or = 40 years were compared between the urban and rural cohorts.

RESULTS

There were 3724 subjects > or = 40 years, with 934 in the urban and 2790 in the rural cohort. The prevalence of POAG was greater in the urban compared with the rural cohort (4% vs 1.6%; P<0.001). Age and intraocular pressure (IOP) were risk factors for POAG in both cohorts. Blindness owing to POAG was 11.1% in the rural and 2.7% in the urban cohort. The prevalence of PACG (1.8% vs 0.7%; P<0.01), primary angle closure (PAC) (0.8% vs 0.2%; P = 0.02) and primary angle closure suspect (PACS; 3.5% vs 1.5%; P<0.01) were significantly different between the urban and rural cohorts. Increasing age was a risk factor in the urban cohort. Intraocular pressure was a risk factor in both the populations. Blindness owing to PACG was equal (20%) in both the populations. Female gender was a risk factor in the rural cohort (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of both POAG and PACG was greater in urban than in the rural population. Intraocular pressure was a significant risk factor for both POAG and PACG in both cohorts. Increasing age was a significant risk factor for POAG in both cohorts and for PACG in the urban cohort. Female gender was a risk factor for PACG in the rural cohort. There was more blindness owing to PACG than to POAG.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

摘要

目的

比较安得拉邦眼病研究中城乡人群原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)和原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)的患病率和危险因素。

设计

采用分层、随机、聚类和系统抽样策略的基于人群的横断面研究。

参与者

1996 年至 2000 年间,纳入了代表人群的 94 个城乡地区的 94 个聚类中的参与者。

方法

我们进行了详细的眼部检查,包括眼压计测量、房角镜检查和排除房角关闭风险后的眼底检查。当需要时,进行 Humphrey 阈值 24-2 视野检查。

主要观察指标

使用国际地理和流行病学眼科协会标准诊断和分类青光眼。比较年龄≥40 岁的城市和农村队列中 POAG 和 PACG 的患病率和危险因素。

结果

共有 3724 名年龄≥40 岁的患者,其中城市组 934 例,农村组 2790 例。与农村队列相比,城市队列中 POAG 的患病率更高(4%比 1.6%;P<0.001)。年龄和眼内压(IOP)是两个队列中 POAG 的危险因素。POAG 导致的失明在农村组为 11.1%,在城市组为 2.7%。PACG(1.8%比 0.7%;P<0.01)、PAC(0.8%比 0.2%;P=0.02)和 PACS(3.5%比 1.5%;P<0.01)的患病率在城乡队列之间差异有统计学意义。年龄的增加是城市队列中的一个危险因素。IOP 是两个人群的危险因素。PACG 导致的失明在两个队列中相同(20%)。女性是农村队列中的一个危险因素(P=0.032)。

结论

与农村人群相比,城市人群中 POAG 和 PACG 的患病率更高。IOP 是两个队列中 POAG 和 PACG 的重要危险因素。年龄的增加是两个队列中 POAG 的一个显著危险因素,也是城市队列中 PACG 的一个危险因素。女性是农村队列中 PACG 的一个危险因素。PACG 导致的失明比 POAG 更多。

金融披露

作者在本文讨论的材料中没有任何专有的或商业利益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验