Suppr超能文献

放大窄带成像与放大白光成像对胃小凹陷性病变的鉴别诊断:一项前瞻性研究。

Magnifying narrow-band imaging versus magnifying white-light imaging for the differential diagnosis of gastric small depressive lesions: a prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Multidisciplinary Cancer Treatment, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):477-84. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.036.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accurate diagnosis of gastric small depressive lesions (SDLs), including gastritis and cancerous lesions, is difficult with conventional endoscopy when using white-light imaging (WLI). Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is expected to make a more accurate diagnosis of gastric SDLs than WLI because it provides better visualization of the mucosal surface and microvascular architecture when combined with magnifying endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the real-time diagnostic accuracy of magnifying WLI and magnifying NBI for gastric SDLs.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

PATIENTS

Fifty-seven lesions in 53 consecutive patients were analyzed: 30 cancers and 27 benign lesions.

INTERVENTIONS

If previously undiagnosed gastric SDLs smaller than 10 mm were identified during an endoscopic examination, magnifying observation with both WLI and NBI was performed for each SDL. Endoscopic diagnosis of SDLs was made by each method on site.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The diagnostic accuracy and the time required for diagnosis.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher for NBI than for WLI (79% vs 44%; P = .0001), as was its sensitivity (70% vs 33%; P = .0005). The diagnostic specificity of NBI (89%) was higher than that of WLI (67%), but the difference was not statistically significant. The time required for the diagnosis was equivalent with both methods.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study, small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding NBI to the WLI examination is essential for making an accurate diagnosis of gastric SDLs compared with magnifying WLI alone. (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry identification number C000000421).

摘要

背景

在常规白光成像(WLI)下,对胃小凹陷性病变(SDLs),包括胃炎和癌性病变的准确诊断较为困难。窄带成像(NBI)有望比 WLI 更准确地诊断胃 SDLs,因为它结合放大内镜可提供更好的黏膜表面和微血管结构可视化。

目的

比较放大 WLI 和放大 NBI 实时诊断胃 SDLs 的准确性。

设计

前瞻性研究。

地点

日本柏市国立癌症中心医院东院。

患者

53 例连续患者的 57 个病变:30 个癌症和 27 个良性病变。

干预措施

如果在内镜检查中发现以前未诊断的小于 10mm 的胃 SDLs,则对每个 SDL 进行放大观察,同时进行 WLI 和 NBI 观察。在现场,内镜诊断 SDLs 由每种方法做出。

主要观察测量

诊断准确性和诊断所需时间。

结果

NBI 的诊断准确性明显高于 WLI(79% vs 44%;P =.0001),敏感性也更高(70% vs 33%;P =.0005)。NBI 的诊断特异性(89%)高于 WLI(67%),但差异无统计学意义。两种方法的诊断所需时间相当。

局限性

单中心研究,样本量小。

结论

与单独放大 WLI 相比,在 WLI 检查中添加 NBI 对于准确诊断胃 SDLs 是必不可少的。(UMIN 临床研究注册编号 C000000421)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验