• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

逆行观察设备使用经验对结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率和退镜时间的影响:第三只眼 Retroscope 研究组。

Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.

机构信息

Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):542-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.021.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.021
PMID:20189513
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy has been adopted as the preferred method to screen for colorectal neoplasia in the United States. However, lesions can be missed because of numerous factors, including location on the proximal aspect of folds or flexures, where they may be difficult to detect with the forward-viewing colonoscope. The Third Eye Retroscope (TER) is a disposable device that is passed through the instrument channel of a standard colonoscope to provide a retrograde view that complements the forward view of the colonoscope during withdrawal.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether experience with the TER affects polyp detection rates and procedure times in experienced endoscopists who had not previously used the equipment.

DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: This was an open-label, prospective, multicenter study at 9 U.S. sites, involving 298 patients presenting for colonoscopy, evaluating the use of the TER in combination with a standard colonoscope.

INTERVENTIONS

After cecal intubation, the TER was inserted through the instrument channel of the colonoscope. During withdrawal, the forward and retrograde video images were observed simultaneously on a wide-screen monitor.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcome measures were the number and size of adenomas and all polyps detected with the standard colonoscope and with the colonoscope combined with the TER. Secondary outcome measures were withdrawal phase time and total procedure time. Each endoscopist examined 20 subjects, divided into quartiles according to the order of their procedures, and results were compared among quartiles.

RESULTS

Overall, 182 polyps were detected with the colonoscope and 27 additional polyps with the TER, a 14.8% increase (P < .001). A total of 100 adenomas were detected with the colonoscope and 16 more with the TER, a 16.0% increase (P < .001). For procedures performed after each endoscopist had completed 15 procedures while using the TER, the mean additional detection rates with the TER were 17.0% for all polyps (P < .001) and 25.0% for adenomas (P < .001). For lesions 6 mm or larger, the overall additional detection rates with the TER for all polyps and for adenomas were 23.2% and 24.3%, respectively. For lesions 10 mm or larger, the overall additional detection rates with the TER for all polyps and for adenomas were 22.6% and 19.0%, respectively. The mean withdrawal times in the first and fourth quartiles were 10.6 and 9.2 minutes, respectively (P = .044).

LIMITATIONS

There was no randomization or separate control group. The endoscopists judged whether each lesion could have been detected with the colonscope alone by using their standard technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Polyp detection rates improved significantly with the TER, especially after 15 procedures, when the mean additional detection rate for adenomas was 25.0%. Additional detection rates with the TER for medium-size and large adenomas were greater than for smaller lesions. These results suggest that, compared with a colonoscope alone, a retrograde-viewing device can increase detection rates for clinically significant adenomas without detriment to procedure time or procedure complications. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00969124.).

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查已被采纳为美国筛查结直肠肿瘤的首选方法。然而,由于许多因素,包括位于褶皱或弯曲的近端,可能难以用前视结肠镜检测到,因此可能会遗漏病变。第三只眼 retroscope(TER)是一种一次性设备,可通过标准结肠镜的器械通道传递,提供逆行视图,在退出时补充结肠镜的前视视图。

目的

评估在未使用过该设备的经验丰富的内镜医生中,使用 TER 是否会影响息肉检测率和手术时间。

设计、地点、患者:这是一项在美国 9 个地点进行的开放标签、前瞻性、多中心研究,涉及 298 名接受结肠镜检查的患者,评估了 TER 与标准结肠镜联合使用的情况。

干预措施

在盲肠插管后,将 TER 通过结肠镜的器械通道插入。在退出过程中,同时在宽屏监视器上观察前视和逆行视频图像。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标是标准结肠镜和结肠镜联合 TER 检测到的腺瘤和所有息肉的数量和大小。次要观察指标是退出阶段时间和总手术时间。每位内镜医生检查 20 例患者,根据操作顺序分为四组,比较四组之间的结果。

结果

总共用结肠镜检测到 182 个息肉,用 TER 检测到 27 个额外的息肉,增加了 14.8%(P <.001)。用结肠镜检测到 100 个腺瘤,用 TER 检测到 16 个腺瘤,增加了 16.0%(P <.001)。对于每个内镜医生在使用 TER 完成 15 例操作后进行的操作,使用 TER 的平均额外检测率为所有息肉的 17.0%(P <.001),腺瘤的 25.0%(P <.001)。对于 6 毫米或更大的病变,TER 对所有息肉和腺瘤的总体额外检测率分别为 23.2%和 24.3%。对于 10 毫米或更大的病变,TER 对所有息肉和腺瘤的总体额外检测率分别为 22.6%和 19.0%。第一和第四四分位数的平均退出时间分别为 10.6 和 9.2 分钟(P =.044)。

局限性

没有随机分组或单独的对照组。内镜医生使用他们的标准技术判断每个病变是否可以仅用结肠镜检测到。

结论

TER 的息肉检测率显著提高,尤其是在进行 15 次操作后,此时腺瘤的平均额外检测率为 25.0%。TER 对中大型腺瘤的额外检测率高于对较小病变的检测率。这些结果表明,与单独使用结肠镜相比,逆行观察设备可以在不损害手术时间或手术并发症的情况下,提高对临床显著腺瘤的检测率。(临床试验注册号:NCT00969124.)。

相似文献

1
Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.逆行观察设备使用经验对结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率和退镜时间的影响:第三只眼 Retroscope 研究组。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):542-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.021.
2
A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos).一种逆行观察装置可提高结肠腺瘤的检出率:前瞻性疗效评估(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):551-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.043. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
3
Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study.逆行观察装置对结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率的影响:TERRACE 研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):480-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
4
A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon.一种新型的逆行观察辅助成像设备(第三眼逆行镜)提高了在结肠解剖模型中对模拟息肉的检测能力。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jan;65(1):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.07.044.
5
Comparison of standard forward-viewing mode versus ultrawide-viewing mode of a novel colonoscopy platform: a prospective, multicenter study in the detection of simulated polyps in an in vitro colon model (with video).新型结肠镜检查平台标准前视模式与超宽视模式的比较:体外结肠模型中模拟息肉检测的前瞻性、多中心研究(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.011.
6
Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.结肠镜检查筛查期间的结肠镜退出时间及腺瘤检出情况
N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2533-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055498.
7
Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.广角结肠镜与标准结肠镜的盲肠插入和退出时间:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jan;6(1):109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
8
Emerging technological advancements in colonoscopy: Third Eye® Retroscope® and Third Eye® Panoramic(TM) , Fuse® Full Spectrum Endoscopy® colonoscopy platform, Extra-Wide-Angle-View colonoscope, and NaviAid(TM) G-EYE(TM) balloon colonoscope.结肠镜检查中的新兴技术进步:第三只眼® Retroscope® 和第三只眼®全景(TM),Fuse®全光谱内窥镜®结肠镜检查平台,超宽视野结肠镜检查,以及 NaviAid(TM)G-EYE(TM)球囊结肠镜检查。
Dig Endosc. 2015 Jan;27(2):223-31. doi: 10.1111/den.12382. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
9
Advanced technology for the improvement of adenoma and polyp detection during colonoscopy.用于在结肠镜检查期间改善腺瘤和息肉检测的先进技术。
Dig Endosc. 2015 Apr;27 Suppl 1:40-4. doi: 10.1111/den.12428.
10
A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging system during colonoscopy.一项评估结肠镜检查期间Third Eye逆行辅助成像系统安全性和有效性的试点研究。
Endoscopy. 2008 Jun;40(6):478-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995811.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of cecal retroflexion observed on adenoma missing of ascending colon during colonoscopy: A prospective, randomized, pilot trial.结肠镜检查中观察到升结肠缺失的盲肠反转对腺瘤的疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、初步试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 25;102(34):e34806. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034806.
2
Image enhanced colonoscopy: updates and prospects-a review.图像增强结肠镜检查:最新进展与前景——综述
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jul 25;8:26. doi: 10.21037/tgh-23-17. eCollection 2023.
3
Detection of colorectal lesions during colonoscopy.
结肠镜检查期间大肠病变的检测。
DEN Open. 2021 Nov 2;2(1):e68. doi: 10.1002/deo2.68. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
The quality of colorectal polypectomy. Is it enough to have just a visual assessment of the site?结直肠息肉切除术的质量。仅仅对切除部位进行目视评估是否足够?
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2020 Oct-Dec;61(4):1301-1307. doi: 10.47162/RJME.61.4.31.
5
Will purposely seeking detect more colorectal polyps than routine performing during colonoscopy?在结肠镜检查过程中,有意寻求检测出比常规操作更多的结直肠息肉吗?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 16;99(42):e22738. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022738.
6
Advances in endoscopy for colorectal polyp detection and classification.用于大肠息肉检测与分类的内窥镜检查进展
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2019 Dec 18;33(1):28-35. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1686327. eCollection 2020 Jan.
7
The Use of Attachment Devices to Aid in Adenoma Detection.使用附着装置辅助腺瘤检测。
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 27;18(1):137-147. doi: 10.1007/s11938-020-00280-4. Print 2020 Mar.
8
Linked color imaging for the detection of early gastrointestinal neoplasms.用于检测早期胃肠道肿瘤的联动彩色成像
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 1;12:1756284819885246. doi: 10.1177/1756284819885246. eCollection 2019.
9
Development of a real-time endoscopic image diagnosis support system using deep learning technology in colonoscopy.利用深度学习技术开发结肠镜检查实时内镜图像诊断支持系统。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 8;9(1):14465. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50567-5.
10
The Role of Behind Folds Visualizing Techniques and Technologies in Improving Adenoma Detection Rate.褶皱后可视化技术与科技在提高腺瘤检出率中的作用
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;17(3):394-407. doi: 10.1007/s11938-019-00242-5.