• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

明尼苏达大学健康促进的效果:支出、缺勤率和参与特定项目的情况。

The effectiveness of health promotion at the University of Minnesota: expenditures, absenteeism, and participation in specific programs.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0392, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Mar;52(3):269-80. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181cf3aed.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181cf3aed
PMID:20190655
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of the University of Minnesota's worksite health promotion program in reducing health care expenditures during the first 2 years of the program; to investigate the program's effect on absenteeism; and to study the effect of specific disease- or lifestyle-management programs on both health care expenditures and absenteeism.

METHODS

Health care expenditures and absenteeism of program participants were compared with those who were eligible but did not participate. Differences-in-differences regression equations with random effects were used to account for selection.

RESULTS

Participation in the general disease management program over 2 years was associated with significant reductions in expenditures, as was participation in programs for certain specific diseases. No consistently significant absenteeism or lifestyle management effects were found.

CONCLUSIONS

: Although the program significantly reduced expenditures, it did not generate a positive return on investment.

摘要

目的

在项目实施的头 2 年,确定明尼苏达大学工作场所健康促进计划在降低医疗支出方面的有效性;调查该计划对旷工的影响;研究特定疾病或生活方式管理计划对医疗支出和旷工的影响。

方法

将参与项目的员工的医疗支出和旷工情况与有资格但未参与的员工进行比较。采用具有随机效应的差分方程来解释选择偏差。

结果

2 年来,参与一般疾病管理计划与支出的显著减少有关,参与某些特定疾病的计划也是如此。但没有发现旷工或生活方式管理的一致显著影响。

结论

尽管该计划显著降低了支出,但没有产生正的投资回报。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of health promotion at the University of Minnesota: expenditures, absenteeism, and participation in specific programs.明尼苏达大学健康促进的效果:支出、缺勤率和参与特定项目的情况。
J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Mar;52(3):269-80. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181cf3aed.
2
A return-on-investment analysis of the health promotion program at the University of Minnesota.明尼苏达大学健康促进项目的投资回报率分析。
J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Jan;51(1):54-65. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31818aab8d.
3
The effectiveness of a health promotion program after 3 years: evidence from the University of Minnesota.健康促进计划 3 年后的效果:来自明尼苏达大学的证据。
Med Care. 2012 Sep;50(9):772-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a8b1f.
4
The 3-year disease management effect: understanding the positive return on investment.3 年疾病管理效果:了解积极的投资回报。
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Nov;55(11):1356-64. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a4fffe.
5
For what illnesses is a disease management program most effective?疾病管理项目对哪些疾病最有效?
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Feb;57(2):117-23. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000385.
6
Health promotion and disease prevention: a look at demand management programs.健康促进与疾病预防:审视需求管理计划。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1996 Sep(177):1-14.
7
Effect of Workplace Weight Management on Health Care Expenditures and Quality of Life.职场体重管理对医疗保健支出和生活质量的影响。
J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Nov;58(11):1073-1078. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000864.
8
[Workplace Health Management -- sick employees cost you money].[工作场所健康管理——患病员工会让你损失金钱]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2013 Nov;138(48):2484. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1359857. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
9
Danger: people at work.危险:正在作业的人员。
Lancet. 2008 Mar 22;371(9617):971-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60434-1.
10
Financial impact of health promotion programs: a comprehensive review of the literature.健康促进项目的财务影响:文献综述
Am J Health Promot. 2001 May-Jun;15(5):296-320. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-15.5.296.

引用本文的文献

1
Employees' Baseline Food Choices and the Effect of a Workplace Intervention to Promote Healthy Eating: Secondary Analysis of the ChooseWell 365 Randomized Controlled Trial.员工的基础食物选择与促进健康饮食的工作场所干预的效果:ChooseWell 365 随机对照试验的二次分析。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2023 Nov;123(11):1586-1595.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2023.05.024. Epub 2023 May 29.
2
A Scoping Review of Economic Evaluations of Workplace Wellness Programs.工作场所健康计划的经济评价:范围综述。
Public Health Rep. 2021 Nov-Dec;136(6):671-684. doi: 10.1177/0033354920976557. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Return on investment of public health interventions: a systematic review.
公共卫生干预措施的投资回报:系统评价。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Aug;71(8):827-834. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208141. Epub 2017 Mar 29.