• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病管理项目对哪些疾病最有效?

For what illnesses is a disease management program most effective?

作者信息

Jutkowitz Eric, Nyman John A, Michaud Tzeyu L, Abraham Jean M, Dowd Bryan

机构信息

From the Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Feb;57(2):117-23. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000385.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000385
PMID:25654512
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We examined the impact of a disease management (DM) program offered at the University of Minnesota for those with various chronic diseases.

METHODS

Differences-in-differences regression equations were estimated to determine the effect of DM participation by chronic condition on expenditures, absenteeism, hospitalizations, and avoidable hospitalizations.

RESULTS

Disease management reduced health care expenditures for individuals with asthma, cardiovascular disease, congestive heart failure, depression, musculoskeletal problems, low back pain, and migraines. Disease management reduced hospitalizations for those same conditions except for congestive heart failure and reduced avoidable hospitalizations for individuals with asthma, depression, and low back pain. Disease management did not have any effect for individuals with diabetes, arthritis, or osteoporosis, nor did DM have any effect on absenteeism.

CONCLUSIONS

Employers should focus on those conditions that generate savings when purchasing DM programs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study suggests that the University of Minnesota's DM program reduces hospitalizations for individuals with asthma, cardiovascular disease, depression, musculoskeletal problems, low back pain, and migraines. The program also reduced avoidable hospitalizations for individuals with asthma, depression, and low back pain.

摘要

目的

我们研究了明尼苏达大学为患有各种慢性病的人群提供的疾病管理(DM)项目的影响。

方法

估计差分回归方程,以确定慢性病患者参与疾病管理对支出、旷工、住院和可避免住院的影响。

结果

疾病管理降低了哮喘、心血管疾病、充血性心力衰竭、抑郁症、肌肉骨骼问题、腰痛和偏头痛患者的医疗保健支出。疾病管理减少了除充血性心力衰竭外上述相同病症的住院次数,并减少了哮喘、抑郁症和腰痛患者的可避免住院次数。疾病管理对糖尿病、关节炎或骨质疏松症患者没有任何影响,对旷工也没有任何影响。

结论

雇主在购买疾病管理项目时应关注那些能产生节约效果的病症。

临床意义

本研究表明,明尼苏达大学的疾病管理项目减少了哮喘、心血管疾病、抑郁症、肌肉骨骼问题、腰痛和偏头痛患者的住院次数。该项目还减少了哮喘、抑郁症和腰痛患者的可避免住院次数。

相似文献

1
For what illnesses is a disease management program most effective?疾病管理项目对哪些疾病最有效?
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Feb;57(2):117-23. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000385.
2
The 3-year disease management effect: understanding the positive return on investment.3 年疾病管理效果:了解积极的投资回报。
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Nov;55(11):1356-64. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a4fffe.
3
The effectiveness of health promotion at the University of Minnesota: expenditures, absenteeism, and participation in specific programs.明尼苏达大学健康促进的效果:支出、缺勤率和参与特定项目的情况。
J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Mar;52(3):269-80. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181cf3aed.
4
Outcomes and lessons learned from evaluating TRICARE's disease management programs.评估 TRICARE 疾病管理计划的结果和经验教训。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jun;16(6):438-46.
5
Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials.护理协调对医疗保险受益人的住院治疗、医疗质量和医疗保健支出的影响:15项随机试验。
JAMA. 2009 Feb 11;301(6):603-18. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.126.
6
Disease management practices of health plans.健康计划的疾病管理实践。
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Apr;8(4):353-61.
7
A return-on-investment analysis of the health promotion program at the University of Minnesota.明尼苏达大学健康促进项目的投资回报率分析。
J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Jan;51(1):54-65. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31818aab8d.
8
Impact of an integrated disease management program in reducing exacerbations in patients with severe asthma and COPD.综合疾病管理项目对减少重度哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者病情加重的影响。
Respir Med. 2014 Dec;108(12):1794-800. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
9
Impact of disease management on health care utilization: evidence from the "Florida: A Healthy State (FAHS)" Medicaid Program.疾病管理对医疗保健利用的影响:来自“佛罗里达:健康之州(FAHS)”医疗补助计划的证据。
Prev Med. 2007 Jun;44(6):547-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 Feb 9.
10
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2.改善慢性病患者的初级保健:慢性病照护模式,第2部分。
JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1909-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1909.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' and stakeholders' experiences of a personalized self-management SUPport program (P-SUP) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or coronary heart disease: a qualitative process evaluation : Maximilian Scholl.患者和利益相关者对 2 型糖尿病和/或冠心病患者个性化自我管理支持计划(P-SUP)的体验:定性过程评价
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2566. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20034-6.
2
Migraine in the workplace.职场中的偏头痛。
eNeurologicalSci. 2022 Jun 6;27:100408. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2022.100408. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care-an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany.
德国基层医疗中疾病管理项目的态度与经验——对全科医生的探索性调查
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2021 Oct;171(13-14):310-320. doi: 10.1007/s10354-021-00867-1. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
4
A Scoping Review of Economic Evaluations of Workplace Wellness Programs.工作场所健康计划的经济评价:范围综述。
Public Health Rep. 2021 Nov-Dec;136(6):671-684. doi: 10.1177/0033354920976557. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Sustaining Work Participation Across the Life Course.维持一生中的工作参与度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Dec;26(4):465-479. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9670-1.