Martin J M, Hart G K, Hicks P
ANZICS House, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 Jan;38(1):149-58. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800124.
The objective of this study was to analyse and report on the distribution and attributes of intensive care services in Australia and New Zealand for the 2005/2006 financial year A survey was mailed to 155 Australian and 26 New Zealand intensive care units (ICU) listed on the database of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society. A descriptive analytical approach was used. Of the 181 ICUs, 177 provided data. In Australia there were 100 public sector and 51 private sector ICUs and in New Zealand, 24 public sector and two private sector ICUs. These units contain 1485 available beds in the public sector and 538 available beds in the private sector Calculations to determine beds per 100,000 population, medical specialists per 1000 patient days and registered nurses per 1000 patient days showed wide variation. International comparisons are limited by lack of data; however it does appear that intensive care patients in Australia and New Zealand have very good outcomes.
本研究的目的是分析并报告2005/2006财政年度澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护服务的分布及属性。向澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护学会数据库中列出的155家澳大利亚重症监护病房和26家新西兰重症监护病房邮寄了一份调查问卷。采用描述性分析方法。在181家重症监护病房中，177家提供了数据。在澳大利亚，有100家公共部门重症监护病房和51家私营部门重症监护病房；在新西兰，有24家公共部门重症监护病房和2家私营部门重症监护病房。这些病房在公共部门有1485张可用床位，在私营部门有538张可用床位。计算每10万人口的床位数、每1000个患者日的医学专家数和每1000个患者日的注册护士数，结果显示差异很大。由于缺乏数据，国际比较受到限制；然而，澳大利亚和新西兰的重症监护患者似乎确实有很好的治疗效果。
