Department of Medical Information & Management Science, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
J Med Syst. 2010 Feb;34(1):95-100. doi: 10.1007/s10916-008-9220-2.
In the health insurance system of Japan, a fee-for-service system has been applied to individual treatment services since 1958. This system involves a structural problem of causing an increase in examination and drug administration. A flat-fee payment system called DPC was introduced in April 2003 to solve the problems of the fee-for-service system. Based on the data of 2003 and 2004, we assessed the impact of DPC in Japan, and obtained the following conclusions: First, the introduction of DPC in Japan could not decrease the absolute value of medical costs; second, the internal efficiency of the institutions was improved, for example, by reducing the mean length of hospitalizations; third, the DPC-based diagnosis classification is considered to be effective for simplifying the medical fee system within the framework of EBM and for providing patients with information; and fourth, after introduction of the DPC, structural problems remain in the flat-fee payment system, such as examination and treatment of low quality, selection of patients and up coding. Its introduction should thus be performed with sufficient caution. We will make greater efforts to establish a better medical fee system by evaluating these problems.
在日本的医疗保险制度中,自 1958 年以来,个体治疗服务一直采用按服务项目收费的制度。该制度存在导致检查和药物治疗增加的结构性问题。为了解决按服务项目收费制度的问题,2003 年 4 月引入了称为 DPC 的固定费用支付制度。基于 2003 年和 2004 年的数据,我们评估了日本 DPC 的影响,并得出以下结论:首先,日本引入 DPC 并不能降低医疗费用的绝对值;其次,机构的内部效率得到提高,例如,住院时间缩短;第三,基于 DPC 的诊断分类被认为在 EBM 的框架内简化医疗费用系统并为患者提供信息是有效的;第四,在引入 DPC 后,固定费用支付系统仍存在结构性问题,例如低质量的检查和治疗、患者选择和编码升级。因此,在引入时应谨慎行事。我们将通过评估这些问题,努力建立更好的医疗费用制度。