• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习模型分析重症监护病房中普通肝素给药后的活化部分凝血活酶时间预测因素。

Analysis of aPTT predictors after unfractionated heparin administration in intensive care units using machine learning models.

作者信息

Kamio Tadashi, Ikegami Masaru, Mizuno Megumi, Ishii Seiichiro, Tajima Hayato, Machida Yoshihito, Fukaguchi Kiyomitsu

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 21;20(7):e0328709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328709. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0328709
PMID:40690448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12279130/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Predicting optimal coagulation control using heparin in intensive care units (ICUs) remains a significant challenge. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in ICU patients receiving unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation and to identify key predictive factors.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Tokushukai Medical Database, covering six hospitals with ICUs in Japan, collected between 2018 and 2022. The study included 945 ICU patients who received unfractionated heparin. The dataset comprised both static and dynamic features, which were used to construct and train ML models. Models were developed to predict aPTT following initial and multiple heparin doses. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC), area under the precision-recall curve (PR AUC), precision, recall, F1 score, and accuracy. SHAP analysis was conducted to determine key predictive factors.

RESULTS

The random forest model demonstrated the highest predictive performance, with ROC AUC values of 0.707 for the first infusion and 0.732 for multiple infusions. Corresponding PR AUC values were 0.539 and 0.551. Despite moderate overall predictive performance, the model exhibited high precision (0.585 for the first infusion and 0.589 for multiple infusions), indicating effectiveness in correctly identifying true positive cases. However, recall and F1 scores were lower, suggesting that some cases, particularly in sub-therapeutic and supra-therapeutic ranges, may have been missed. Incorporating time-series data, such as vital signs, provided only marginal improvements in performance.

CONCLUSIONS

ML models demonstrated moderate performance in predicting aPTT following heparin infusion in ICU patients, with the random forest model achieving the highest classification accuracy. Although the models effectively identified true positive cases, their overall predictive performance remained limited, necessitating further refinement. The inclusion of static and dynamic features did not significantly enhance model accuracy. Future studies should explore additional factors to improve predictive models for optimizing individualized anticoagulation management in ICUs.

摘要

目的

在重症监护病房(ICU)中使用肝素预测最佳凝血控制仍然是一项重大挑战。本研究旨在开发一种机器学习(ML)模型,以预测接受普通肝素抗凝治疗的ICU患者的活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT),并确定关键预测因素。

方法

数据来自德洲会医疗数据库,涵盖日本六家设有ICU的医院,收集时间为2018年至2022年。该研究纳入了945例接受普通肝素治疗的ICU患者。数据集包括静态和动态特征,用于构建和训练ML模型。开发模型以预测首次和多次肝素剂量后的aPTT。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC AUC)、精确召回曲线下面积(PR AUC)、精确率、召回率、F1分数和准确率评估模型性能。进行SHAP分析以确定关键预测因素。

结果

随机森林模型表现出最高的预测性能,首次输注时的ROC AUC值为0.707,多次输注时为0.732。相应的PR AUC值分别为0.539和0.551。尽管总体预测性能中等,但该模型具有较高的精确率(首次输注时为0.585,多次输注时为0.589),表明在正确识别真阳性病例方面有效。然而,召回率和F1分数较低,这表明一些病例,特别是在治疗不足和治疗过度范围内的病例,可能被遗漏了。纳入生命体征等时间序列数据仅在性能上带来了边际改善。

结论

ML模型在预测ICU患者肝素输注后的aPTT方面表现中等,随机森林模型实现了最高的分类准确率。虽然这些模型有效地识别了真阳性病例,但其总体预测性能仍然有限,需要进一步改进。纳入静态和动态特征并未显著提高模型准确性。未来的研究应探索其他因素,以改进预测模型,优化ICU中的个体化抗凝管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e41/12279130/5b1085dc9a60/pone.0328709.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e41/12279130/b5f51d48f0ba/pone.0328709.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e41/12279130/32d65a34fd51/pone.0328709.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e41/12279130/15095aa8a49e/pone.0328709.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e41/12279130/5b1085dc9a60/pone.0328709.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e41/12279130/b5f51d48f0ba/pone.0328709.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e41/12279130/32d65a34fd51/pone.0328709.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e41/12279130/15095aa8a49e/pone.0328709.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e41/12279130/5b1085dc9a60/pone.0328709.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of aPTT predictors after unfractionated heparin administration in intensive care units using machine learning models.使用机器学习模型分析重症监护病房中普通肝素给药后的活化部分凝血活酶时间预测因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 21;20(7):e0328709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328709. eCollection 2025.
2
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
5
Development and Validation of a Convolutional Neural Network Model to Predict a Pathologic Fracture in the Proximal Femur Using Abdomen and Pelvis CT Images of Patients With Advanced Cancer.利用晚期癌症患者腹部和骨盆 CT 图像建立卷积神经网络模型预测股骨近端病理性骨折的研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Nov 1;481(11):2247-2256. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002771. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
6
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
7
Machine Learning Did Not Outperform Conventional Competing Risk Modeling to Predict Revision Arthroplasty.在预测翻修关节成形术方面,机器学习的表现并未优于传统的竞争风险模型。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1472-1482. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003018. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Development and external validation of machine learning models for the early prediction of malnutrition in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.用于危重症患者营养不良早期预测的机器学习模型的开发与外部验证:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03082-9.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.

本文引用的文献

1
Timing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Resumption Following Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Nationwide Study in Japan.结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术后直接口服抗凝剂恢复使用的时机:日本的一项全国性研究
Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 1;120(3):623-631. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003050. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Dynamic Prediction of Patient Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit: A Scoping Review of the State-of-the-Art.动态预测重症监护病房患者结局:最新技术述评。
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;38(7):575-591. doi: 10.1177/08850666231166349. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
Real-World Outcomes of Systemic Therapy in Japanese Patients with Cancer (Tokushukai REAl-World Data Project: TREAD): Study Protocol for a Nationwide Cohort Study.
日本癌症患者系统治疗的真实世界结局(德洲会真实世界数据项目:TREAD):一项全国队列研究的研究方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Oct 28;10(11):2146. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112146.
4
A Recurrent Neural Network Model for Predicting Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time After Treatment With Heparin: Retrospective Study.一种用于预测肝素治疗后活化部分凝血活酶时间的递归神经网络模型:回顾性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Oct 13;10(10):e39187. doi: 10.2196/39187.
5
A Clinical Prediction Model to Predict Heparin Treatment Outcomes and Provide Dosage Recommendations: Development and Validation Study.一种用于预测肝素治疗结局并提供剂量建议的临床预测模型:开发和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 20;23(5):e27118. doi: 10.2196/27118.
6
Systematic review of machine learning models for personalised dosing of heparin.系统评价机器学习模型在肝素个体化给药中的应用。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Nov;87(11):4124-4139. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14852. Epub 2021 May 14.
7
Toward Optimal Heparin Dosing by Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Methods: Retrospective Study.通过比较多种机器学习方法实现最佳肝素剂量:回顾性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jun 22;8(6):e17648. doi: 10.2196/17648.
8
Association of pre-operative chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury with in-hospital outcomes of emergency colorectal surgery: a cohort study.术前慢性肾脏病和急性肾损伤与急诊结直肠手术住院结局的关系:一项队列研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Mar 26;15(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00303-6.
9
Artificial intelligence algorithm for predicting mortality of patients with acute heart failure.人工智能算法预测急性心力衰竭患者的死亡率。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 8;14(7):e0219302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219302. eCollection 2019.
10
Derivation and Validation of Age- and Body Mass Index-Adjusted Weight-Based Unfractionated Heparin Dosing.年龄和体重指数调整后的基于体重的普通肝素剂量推导与验证
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029619833480. doi: 10.1177/1076029619833480.