Neurologic Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
Am J Med. 2010 Mar;123(3):245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.09.018.
There are conflicting opinions on whether postural tachycardia syndrome predisposes to syncope. We investigated this relationship by comparing the frequency of syncope in postural tachycardia syndrome and orthostatic hypotension.
We queried our autonomic laboratory database of 3700 patients. Orthostatic hypotension and postural tachycardia syndrome were defined in standard fashion, except that postural tachycardia syndrome required the presence of orthostatic symptoms and a further increase in heart rate beyond 10 minutes. Syncope was defined as an abrupt decrease in blood pressure and often, heart rate, requiring termination of the tilt study. Statistical analysis utilized Fisher's exact test and Student's t test, as appropriate.
Of 810 patients referred for postural tachycardia syndrome, 185 met criteria while another 328 patients had orthostatic hypotension. Of the postural tachycardia syndrome patients, 38% had syncope on head-up tilt, compared with only 22% of those with orthostatic hypotension (P<.0001). In the postural tachycardia group, syncope on head-up tilt was associated with a clinical history of syncope in 90%, whereas absence of syncope on head-up tilt was associated with a clinical history of syncope in 30% (P<.0001). In contrast, syncope on head-up tilt did not bear any relationship to clinical history of syncope in the orthostatic hypotension group (41% vs 36%; P=.49).
Our results demonstrate that syncope (both tilt table and clinical) occurs far more commonly in patients who have postural tachycardia syndrome than in patients with orthostatic hypotension. These findings suggest that one should be clinically aware of the high risk of syncope in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome, and the low-pressure baroreceptor system that is implicated in postural tachycardia syndrome might confer more sensitivity to syncope than the high pressure system implicated in orthostatic hypotension.
体位性心动过速综合征是否会导致晕厥存在争议。我们通过比较体位性心动过速综合征和直立性低血压患者晕厥的发生率来研究这种关系。
我们查询了 3700 例患者的自主神经实验室数据库。按照标准方法定义直立性低血压和体位性心动过速综合征,只是体位性心动过速综合征需要存在直立症状和心率在 10 分钟后进一步增加。晕厥定义为血压突然下降,通常心率也会下降,需要终止倾斜试验。统计分析采用 Fisher 确切检验和学生 t 检验,视情况而定。
在 810 例因体位性心动过速综合征而转诊的患者中,185 例符合标准,另有 328 例患有直立性低血压。在体位性心动过速综合征患者中,38%在头高位倾斜试验中发生晕厥,而直立性低血压患者中只有 22%(P<.0001)。在体位性心动过速组中,头高位倾斜试验中发生晕厥与晕厥临床病史相关的比例为 90%,而头高位倾斜试验中无晕厥与晕厥临床病史相关的比例为 30%(P<.0001)。相比之下,头高位倾斜试验中发生晕厥与直立性低血压组的晕厥临床病史无任何关系(41%比 36%;P=.49)。
我们的结果表明,在体位性心动过速综合征患者中,晕厥(包括倾斜试验和临床)比在直立性低血压患者中更常见。这些发现表明,在体位性心动过速综合征患者中,临床医生应意识到晕厥的风险很高,而体位性心动过速综合征中涉及的低压压力感受器系统可能比直立性低血压中涉及的高压系统对晕厥更敏感。