Clougherty Jane E, Rossi Christina A, Lawrence Joy, Long Mark S, Diaz Edgar A, Lim Robert H, McEwen Bruce, Koutrakis Petros, Godleski John J
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Jun;118(6):769-75. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901631. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
Epidemiologic evidence suggests that chronic stress may alter susceptibility to air pollution. However, persistent spatial confounding between these exposures may limit the utility of epidemiologic methods to disentangle these effects and cannot identify physiologic mechanisms for potential differential susceptibilities.
Using a rat model of social stress, we compared respiratory responses to fine concentrated ambient particles (CAPs) and examined biological markers of inflammation.
Twenty-four 12-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four groups [stress/CAPs, stress/filtered air (FA), nonstress/CAPs, nonstress/FA]. Stress-group animals were individually introduced into the home cage of a dominant male twice weekly. Blood drawn at sacrifice was analyzed for immune and inflammatory markers. CAPs were generated using the Harvard ambient particle concentrator, which draws real-time urban ambient fine particles, enriching concentrations approximately 30 times. CAPs/FA exposures were delivered in single-animal plethysmographs, 5 hr/day for 10 days, and respiratory function was continuously monitored using a Buxco system.
Stressed animals displayed higher average C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and white blood cell counts than did nonstressed animals. Only among stressed animals were CAPs exposures associated with increased respiratory frequency, lower flows, and lower volumes, suggesting a rapid, shallow breathing pattern. Conversely, in animals with elevated CAPs exposures alone, we observed increased inspiratory flows and greater minute volumes (volume of air inhaled or exhaled per minute).
CAPs effects on respiratory measures differed significantly, and substantively, by stress group. Higher CAPs exposures were associated with a rapid, shallow breathing pattern only under chronic stress. Blood measures provided evidence of inflammatory responses. Results support epidemiologic findings that chronic stress may alter respiratory response to air pollution and may help elucidate pathways for differential susceptibility.
流行病学证据表明,慢性应激可能会改变对空气污染的易感性。然而,这些暴露之间持续存在的空间混杂因素可能会限制流行病学方法在区分这些影响方面的效用,并且无法识别潜在差异易感性的生理机制。
使用社会应激大鼠模型,我们比较了对细颗粒物(CAPs)的呼吸反应,并检测了炎症的生物标志物。
将24只12周龄雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠随机分为四组[应激/CAPs组、应激/过滤空气(FA)组、非应激/CAPs组、非应激/FA组]。应激组动物每周两次被单独放入一只优势雄性大鼠的笼舍中。处死时采集血液,分析免疫和炎症标志物。使用哈佛环境颗粒物浓缩器生成CAPs,该浓缩器采集实时城市环境细颗粒物,将浓度提高约30倍。在单动物体积描记器中进行CAPs/FA暴露,每天5小时,持续10天,并使用Buxco系统连续监测呼吸功能。
应激动物的平均C反应蛋白、肿瘤坏死因子-α和白细胞计数高于非应激动物。仅在应激动物中,CAPs暴露与呼吸频率增加、流量降低和容积降低有关,表明呼吸模式快速且浅。相反,仅在CAPs暴露增加的动物中,我们观察到吸气流量增加和每分通气量增加(每分钟吸入或呼出的空气量)。
CAPs对呼吸指标的影响在应激组之间存在显著且实质性的差异。仅在慢性应激下,较高的CAPs暴露与快速、浅的呼吸模式有关。血液检测结果提供了炎症反应的证据。结果支持了流行病学研究结果,即慢性应激可能会改变对空气污染的呼吸反应,并可能有助于阐明差异易感性的途径。