• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进长期机构精神卫生保健中的康复:一项国际德尔菲研究。

Promoting recovery in long-term institutional mental health care: an international Delphi study.

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, St. George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Mar;61(3):293-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.3.293.

DOI:10.1176/ps.2010.61.3.293
PMID:20194407
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Service provision in psychiatric and social care is increasingly guided by recovery principles. However, little is known about the degree of consensus among stakeholders in diverse contexts on the components of care that most promote recovery. This study aimed to identify specific items of care that key stakeholders regard as most important in promoting recovery for people with longer-term mental health problems in institutional care, to measure consensus between and across stakeholder groups and countries, and to develop a conceptual framework of the most important domains of care.

METHODS

Ten European countries in various stages of deinstitutionalization participated in a series of conventional three-round iterative Delphi exercises. In each country individuals in four separate expert groups (service users, mental health professionals, caregivers, and advocates) identified components of care that they considered important to recovery and then rated their group's suggestions in terms of importance. Median and consensus ratings were measured. High-ranking items were grouped into domains.

RESULTS

A total of 4,098 separate items of care were proposed by the 40 participating groups. Eleven broad domains of care important for recovery were identified: social policy and human rights, social inclusion, self-management and autonomy, therapeutic interventions, governance, staffing, staff attitudes, institutional environment, postdischarge care, caregivers, and physical health care. Consensus between groups and countries was generally high, but some modest differences in priorities were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The most consistently highly rated consensus domain was therapeutic interventions. Domains and components of care related to recovery principles were also viewed as important across stakeholder groups.

摘要

目的

精神科和社会护理服务的提供越来越多地遵循康复原则。然而,对于不同背景下的利益相关者在促进康复方面最重要的护理内容方面的共识程度知之甚少。本研究旨在确定关键利益相关者认为在机构护理中对长期精神健康问题患者的康复最重要的特定护理内容,衡量利益相关者群体和国家之间以及跨群体之间的共识,并制定最重要的护理领域的概念框架。

方法

十个处于去机构化不同阶段的欧洲国家参与了一系列常规的三轮迭代德尔菲调查。在每个国家,四个不同专家群体(服务使用者、心理健康专业人员、护理人员和倡导者)的个人确定了他们认为对康复重要的护理内容,然后根据重要性对他们所在群体的建议进行评分。衡量中位数和共识评分。排名较高的项目被分为不同的领域。

结果

40 个参与小组共提出了 4098 项单独的护理内容。确定了 11 个对康复很重要的广泛护理领域:社会政策和人权、社会包容、自我管理和自主权、治疗干预、治理、人员配备、员工态度、机构环境、出院后护理、护理人员和身体健康护理。群体和国家之间的共识通常很高,但也注意到一些优先事项存在适度差异。

结论

一致性最高的共识领域是治疗干预。与康复原则相关的领域和护理内容也被各利益相关者群体视为重要内容。

相似文献

1
Promoting recovery in long-term institutional mental health care: an international Delphi study.促进长期机构精神卫生保健中的康复:一项国际德尔菲研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Mar;61(3):293-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.3.293.
2
Study protocol for the development of a European measure of best practice for people with long term mental health problems in institutional care (DEMoBinc).机构护理中针对长期存在心理健康问题人群的欧洲最佳实践衡量标准制定研究方案(DEMoBinc)
BMC Psychiatry. 2009 Jun 13;9:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-9-36.
3
Quality of longer term mental health facilities in Europe: validation of the quality indicator for rehabilitative care against service users' views.欧洲长期精神卫生机构的质量:康复护理质量指标对服务使用者观点的验证。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038070. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
4
Learning from consumers: An eDelphi study of Australian mental health consumers' priorities for recovery-oriented curricula.向消费者学习:一项关于澳大利亚心理健康消费者对以康复为导向课程的优先事项的电子德尔菲研究。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Dec;65(6):586-597. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12518. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
5
A systematic review of the international published literature relating to quality of institutional care for people with longer term mental health problems.一项关于长期心理健康问题患者机构护理质量的国际已发表文献的系统综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2009 Sep 7;9:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-9-55.
6
Living conditions and quality of care in residential units for people with long-term mental illness in Portugal--a cross-sectional study.葡萄牙长期精神疾病患者居住单元的生活条件与护理质量——一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 20;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0743-7.
7
An international comparison of the deinstitutionalisation of mental health care: Development and findings of the Mental Health Services Deinstitutionalisation Measure (MENDit).精神卫生保健去机构化的国际比较:精神卫生服务去机构化衡量标准(MENDit)的发展与研究结果
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 29;16:54. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0762-4.
8
Seen as core: a Delphi consensus study of essential elements of mental health nursing care in Ireland.被视为核心:爱尔兰心理健康护理基本要素的德尔菲共识研究。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2010 Oct;24(5):339-48. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 May 21.
9
Assisting Australians with mental health problems and financial difficulties: a Delphi study to develop guidelines for financial counsellors, financial institution staff, mental health professionals and carers.为有心理健康问题和经济困难的澳大利亚人提供帮助:一项德尔菲研究,旨在为金融顾问、金融机构工作人员、心理健康专业人员和护理人员制定指导方针。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 3;15:218. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0868-2.
10
Are we on the same page? Multiple stakeholders and service users priorities for dementia care and policy: A Delphi study.我们在同一页上吗?痴呆症护理和政策的多方利益相关者和服务用户的优先事项:德尔菲研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Sep;133:104300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104300. Epub 2022 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The relational institution: an ethnographic study of recovery orientation and relational engagement on a psychiatric rehabilitation ward in London.关系机构:对伦敦一家精神康复病房康复取向和关系参与的民族志研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06140-0.
2
Exploring the Quality-of-Care Dynamics of Inpatient Psychosocial Rehabilitation in Community-Based Mental Health Services: A Comprehensive Analysis.探索社区心理健康服务中住院心理社会康复的护理质量动态:综合分析
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jan;61(1):55-58. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01325-z. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
3
Mental Health Staff's Perspectives on Tapering of Antipsychotic Medication: A Focus Group Study.
精神卫生工作人员对抗精神病药物逐渐减量的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
Qual Health Res. 2023 Nov;33(13):1165-1176. doi: 10.1177/10497323231195821. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
4
Three-year-cohort-study: clinical and cost effectiveness of an inpatient psychiatric rehabilitation.三年队列研究:住院精神科康复的临床效果和成本效益
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 28;14:1140265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1140265. eCollection 2023.
5
Housing First for homeless people with severe mental illness: extended 4-year follow-up and analysis of recovery and housing stability from the randomized trial.住房优先策略治疗严重精神疾病的 homeless people:一项随机试验的 4 年随访及康复和住房稳定性分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 Feb 7;31:e14. doi: 10.1017/S2045796022000026.
6
Prevention and Recovery Care Services in Australia: Developing a State-Wide Typology of a Subacute Residential Mental Health Service Model.澳大利亚的预防与康复护理服务:构建亚急性住院精神卫生服务模式的全州类型学
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 11;10:383. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00383. eCollection 2019.
7
Predictors of quality of care in mental health supported accommodation services in England: a multiple regression modelling study.英格兰精神健康支持性住宿服务质量的预测因素:一项多元回归建模研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1912-7.
8
The property of the Japanese version of the Recovery Knowledge Inventory (RKI) among mental health service providers: a cross sectional study.日本版康复知识量表(RKI)在心理健康服务提供者中的特性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Dec 28;11:71. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0178-7. eCollection 2017.
9
Adaptation of the Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC) for use in mental health supported accommodation services (QuIRC-SA).用于心理健康支持性住宿服务的康复护理质量指标(QuIRC-SA)的改编。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 14;16:101. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0799-4.
10
Living conditions and quality of care in residential units for people with long-term mental illness in Portugal--a cross-sectional study.葡萄牙长期精神疾病患者居住单元的生活条件与护理质量——一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 20;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0743-7.