氯吡格雷无反应者和有反应者对替卡格雷的反应及转换治疗的效果:RESPOND 研究。
Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies: the RESPOND study.
机构信息
Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
出版信息
Circulation. 2010 Mar 16;121(10):1188-99. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.919456. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
BACKGROUND
The antiplatelet effects of the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial dose of ticagrelor in patients nonresponsive to clopidogrel and after they switch agents are unknown.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Patients with stable coronary artery disease on aspirin therapy received a 300-mg clopidogrel load; nonresponders were identified by light transmittance aggregometry. In a 2-way crossover design, nonresponders (n=41) and responders (n=57) randomly received clopidogrel (600 mg/75 mg once daily) or ticagrelor (180 mg/90 mg twice daily) for 14 days during period 1. In period 2, all nonresponders switched treatment; half of the responders continued the same treatment, whereas the others switched treatment. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was higher in nonresponders treated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel (P<0.05). Treatment with ticagrelor among nonresponders resulted in a >10%, >30%, and >50% decrease in platelet aggregation from baseline in 100%, 75%, and 13% of patients, respectively. Platelet aggregation fell from 59+/-9% to 35+/-11% in patients switched from clopidogrel to ticagrelor and increased from 36+/-14% to 56+/-9% in patients switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel (P<0.0001 for both). Platelet reactivity was below the cut points previously associated with ischemic risk measured by light transmittance aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y(12) assay, and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation in 98% to 100% of patients after ticagrelor therapy versus 44% to 76% of patients after clopidogrel therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Ticagrelor therapy overcomes nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel, and its antiplatelet effect is the same in responders and nonresponders. Nearly all clopidogrel nonresponders and responders treated with ticagrelor will have platelet reactivity below the cut points associated with ischemic risk. Clinical Trial Registration- http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00642811.
背景
PLATO 试验中替格瑞洛的抗血小板作用剂量在对氯吡格雷无反应的患者和更换药物后的患者中的效果尚不清楚。
方法和结果
接受阿司匹林治疗的稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者接受了 300 毫克氯吡格雷负荷量;通过光透射聚集法确定无反应者。在 2 向交叉设计中,无反应者(n=41)和反应者(n=57)随机接受氯吡格雷(600 毫克/75 毫克每日 1 次)或替格瑞洛(180 毫克/90 毫克每日 2 次)治疗 14 天,在此期间 1 期。在第 2 期,所有无反应者均转换治疗;一半的反应者继续接受相同的治疗,而另一半则转换治疗。与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛治疗的无反应者血小板聚集抑制作用更高(P<0.05)。无反应者接受替格瑞洛治疗后,血小板聚集分别减少了 10%、30%和 50%以上的患者比例分别为 100%、75%和 13%。从基线开始,从氯吡格雷转换为替格瑞洛的患者的血小板聚集从 59+/-9%下降至 35+/-11%,而从替格瑞洛转换为氯吡格雷的患者的血小板聚集从 36+/-14%增加至 56+/-9%(两者均 P<0.0001)。替格瑞洛治疗后,通过光透射聚集法、VerifyNow P2Y(12)测定法和血管扩张刺激磷蛋白磷酸化测定法测量,血小板反应性低于缺血风险相关的切点的患者比例为 98%至 100%,而氯吡格雷治疗后低于该切点的患者比例为 44%至 76%。
结论
替格瑞洛治疗可克服对氯吡格雷的无反应性,其抗血小板作用在反应者和无反应者中相同。接受替格瑞洛治疗的几乎所有氯吡格雷无反应者和反应者的血小板反应性均低于与缺血风险相关的切点。临床试验注册-http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。独特标识符:NCT00642811。