文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在肾功能相关的急性冠状动脉综合征中的比较:来自血小板抑制和患者结局(PLATO)试验的结果。

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes in relation to renal function: results from the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.

机构信息

Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Circulation. 2010 Sep 14;122(11):1056-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.933796. Epub 2010 Aug 30.


DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.933796
PMID:20805430
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reduced renal function is associated with a poorer prognosis and increased bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes and may therefore alter the risk-benefit ratio with antiplatelet therapies. In the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel reduced the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 12 months but with similar major bleeding rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: Central laboratory serum creatinine levels were available in 15 202 (81.9%) acute coronary syndrome patients at baseline, and creatinine clearance, estimated by the Cockcroft Gault equation, was calculated. In patients with chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <60 mL/min; n=3237), ticagrelor versus clopidogrel significantly reduced the primary end point to 17.3% from 22.0% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.90) with an absolute risk reduction greater than that of patients with normal renal function (n=11 965): 7.9% versus 8.9% (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.02). In patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor reduced total mortality (10.0% versus 14.0%; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.89). Major bleeding rates, fatal bleedings, and non-coronary bypass-related major bleedings were not significantly different between the 2 randomized groups (15.1% versus 14.3%; HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.30; 0.34% versus 0.77%; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.54; and 8.5% versus 7.3%; HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.68). The interactions between creatinine clearance and randomized treatment on any of the outcome variables were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: In acute coronary syndrome patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel significantly reduces ischemic end points and mortality without a significant increase in major bleeding but with numerically more non-procedure-related bleeding. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL:http://www.clinicatrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

摘要

背景:在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,肾功能降低与预后较差和出血风险增加相关,因此可能改变抗血小板治疗的风险效益比。在血小板抑制和患者结局(PLATO)试验中,替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相比,在 12 个月时降低了心血管死亡、心肌梗死和中风的主要复合终点,但大出血发生率相似。

方法和结果:在基线时有 15202 例(81.9%)急性冠状动脉综合征患者可获得中心实验室血清肌酐水平,通过 Cockcroft-Gault 方程计算估算的肌酐清除率。在慢性肾脏病患者(肌酐清除率<60ml/min;n=3237)中,替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相比,主要终点显著降低,从 22.0%降至 17.3%(风险比[HR],0.77;95%置信区间[CI],0.65 至 0.90),且绝对风险降低大于肾功能正常患者(n=11965):7.9%比 8.9%(HR,0.90;95%CI,0.79 至 1.02)。在慢性肾脏病患者中,替格瑞洛降低了总死亡率(10.0%比 14.0%;HR,0.72;95%CI,0.58 至 0.89)。两组随机治疗的大出血发生率、致死性出血和非冠状动脉旁路相关大出血发生率无显著差异(15.1%比 14.3%;HR,1.07;95%CI,0.88 至 1.30;0.34%比 0.77%;HR,0.48;95%CI,0.15 至 1.54;8.5%比 7.3%;HR,1.28;95%CI,0.97 至 1.68)。肌酐清除率与随机治疗之间的交互作用在任何结局变量上均无统计学意义。

结论:在患有慢性肾脏病的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相比,可显著降低缺血终点和死亡率,且大出血发生率无显著增加,但非手术相关出血的发生率略高。

临床试验注册:网址:http://www.clinicatrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00391872。

相似文献

[1]
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes in relation to renal function: results from the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.

Circulation. 2010-8-30

[2]
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010-12-30

[3]
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes: a substudy from the prospective randomized PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012-9-1

[4]
Reduction in first and recurrent cardiovascular events with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the PLATO Study.

Circulation. 2012-12-31

[5]
Association of proton pump inhibitor use on cardiovascular outcomes with clopidogrel and ticagrelor: insights from the platelet inhibition and patient outcomes trial.

Circulation. 2012-1-18

[6]
Comparison of ticagrelor, the first reversible oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.

Am Heart J. 2009-4

[7]
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Circulation. 2012-5-9

[8]
Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies: the RESPOND study.

Circulation. 2010-3-1

[9]
Ticagrelor--a new platelet aggregation inhibitor in patients with acute coronary syndromes. An improvement of other inhibitors?

Med Sci Monit. 2009-12

[10]
ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial: insights from the ECG substudy.

Circulation. 2011-12-16

引用本文的文献

[1]
Optimal antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome and chronic kidney disease: for the Jerusalem platelets thrombosis and intervention in cardiology (JUPITER-11) study group.

BMC Nephrol. 2025-8-4

[2]
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in loss-of-function carriers with stroke or TIA stratified by age and renal function: CHANCE-2 trial substudy.

Ren Fail. 2025-12

[3]
Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: Navigating Efficacy and Safety.

J Clin Med. 2025-6-3

[4]
Deescalation From Ticagrelor to Clopidogrel for Myocardial Infarction With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Netw Open. 2025-5-1

[5]
Antiplatelet strategy for patients with acute coronary syndrome and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025-2-20

[6]
Comparison of 1-Year Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Type 2 Diabetes Patients After Implantation of Small Diameter Stents.

Anatol J Cardiol. 2025-1-7

[7]
Reversal of Platelet Inhibition in Patients Receiving Ticagrelor.

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022-9-5

[8]
Management Considerations for Acute Coronary Syndromes in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024-5

[9]
The Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Gaps, Challenges, and Solutions.

Kidney Dis (Basel). 2023-10-18

[10]
Progress in the clinical effects and adverse reactions of ticagrelor.

Thromb J. 2024-1-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索