评价替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗效果的VerifyNow P2Y12 检测的实用性。
Usefulness of the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay to evaluate the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel therapies.
机构信息
Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Baltimore, MD, USA.
出版信息
Am Heart J. 2012 Jul;164(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.03.022. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
OBJECTIVES
We analyzed the antiplatelet effects of different P2Y(12) receptor blockers with VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (VN-P2Y12) and light transmittance aggregometry (LTA).
BACKGROUND
The point-of-care VN-P2Y12 has been used to assess the antiplatelet effects in clopidogrel-treated patients but has not been evaluated in detail in patients treated with ticagrelor.
METHODS
Patients were randomly assigned to either ticagrelor [180 mg loading/90 mg twice daily (n = 37)] or clopidogrel [600 mg loading/75 mg daily (n = 39)] on top of aspirin treatment, and platelet reactivity was measured serially during onset, maintenance, and offset phases. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as 5 and 20 μM adenosine diphosphate-induced maximal platelet aggregation ≥46% and ≥59%, respectively, and P2Y12 reaction units ≥235.
RESULTS
Platelet function measured by VN-P2Y12 correlated well with LTA (.812 ≤ ρ ≤ .823, P < .001). VN-P2Y12 "BASE" values were consistent during administration of both agents. Calculated and reported percent inhibitions by VN-P2Y12 were similar (difference, -0.6%; 95% agreement limits, -22.9% to 21.6%). Platelet inhibition by VN-P2Y12 during clopidogrel and ticagrelor administrations was comparable to platelet inhibition by LTA. HPR determined by LTA and VN-P2Y12 were well matched, and the risk stratification between the two methods showed strong agreement after both therapies (κ > .7).
CONCLUSIONS
The VerifyNow P2Y12 assay is effective in assessing the antiplatelet effects and in identifying HPR during clopidogrel or ticagrelor therapy.
目的
我们使用 VerifyNow P2Y12 检测(VN-P2Y12)和光传输聚集度测定法(LTA)分析了不同 P2Y(12)受体阻滞剂的抗血小板作用。
背景
即时检测的 VN-P2Y12 已被用于评估氯吡格雷治疗患者的抗血小板作用,但尚未在替格瑞洛治疗患者中进行详细评估。
方法
患者随机分为替格瑞洛组[180mg 负荷量/90mg 每日 2 次(n=37)]或氯吡格雷组[600mg 负荷量/75mg 每日 1 次(n=39)],在阿司匹林治疗的基础上进行治疗,并在起始、维持和消退阶段连续测量血小板反应性。高反应性血小板(HPR)定义为 5μM 和 20μM 二磷酸腺苷诱导的最大血小板聚集率分别≥46%和≥59%,以及 P2Y12 反应单位≥235。
结果
VN-P2Y12 测量的血小板功能与 LTA 相关性良好(0.812≤ρ≤0.823,P<0.001)。两种药物治疗期间,VN-P2Y12“BASE”值保持一致。VN-P2Y12 计算和报告的抑制率相似(差异,-0.6%;95%置信区间,-22.9%至 21.6%)。氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛治疗期间,VN-P2Y12 对血小板的抑制作用与 LTA 对血小板的抑制作用相当。LTA 和 VN-P2Y12 确定的 HPR 非常匹配,两种方法的风险分层在两种治疗方法后均显示出高度一致(κ>0.7)。
结论
VerifyNow P2Y12 检测在评估氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛治疗期间的抗血小板作用和识别 HPR 方面是有效的。