• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决“杂货店差距”的政策方案。

Policy solutions to the 'grocery gap'.

机构信息

Research and Evaluation, Food Trust, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Mar-Apr;29(3):473-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0740.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0740
PMID:20194989
Abstract

In 2001 the Food Trust, a nonprofit organization committed to ensuring access to affordable, nutritious food, focused attention on the lack of access to healthy foods in Philadelphia by creating food access maps and convening a task force. The campaign led to the creation of a statewide initiative that to date has funded seventy-eight fresh food outlets in Pennsylvania, increasing food access for 500,000 children and adults. This success has led to interest from other states and the federal government in expanding the initiative. Here we present the Food Trust's five-step framework for increasing access to fresh, healthy food in other locales.

摘要

2001 年,致力于确保人们能够负担得起营养食品的非营利组织“食品信托基金”(Food Trust),通过创建食品获取地图和召集特别工作组,关注费城获取健康食品的机会不足的问题。该运动促使创建了全州范围的倡议,迄今为止,该倡议已在宾夕法尼亚州资助了 78 个新鲜食品店,为 50 万名儿童和成人增加了食品获取机会。这一成功引起了其他州和联邦政府的兴趣,希望扩大这一倡议。在这里,我们提出了“食品信托基金”(Food Trust)在其他地区增加新鲜、健康食品获取的五步框架。

相似文献

1
Policy solutions to the 'grocery gap'.解决“杂货店差距”的政策方案。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Mar-Apr;29(3):473-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0740.
2
Closing the grocery gap in underserved communities: the creation of the Pennsylvania Fresh Food Financing Initiative.缩小服务欠缺社区的食品杂货店差距:宾夕法尼亚新鲜食品融资计划的创立。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 May-Jun;14(3):272-9. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000316486.57512.bf.
3
Positive influence of the revised Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children food packages on access to healthy foods.修订后的《妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养计划》食品包对获得健康食品的积极影响。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Jun;112(6):850-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.02.019.
4
Reestablishing healthy food retail: changing the landscape of food deserts.重建健康食品零售:改变食物荒漠的面貌。
Child Obes. 2012 Feb;8(1):28-30. doi: 10.1089/chi.2011.0113.
5
Healthy options: a community-based program to address food insecurity.健康选择:一项应对粮食不安全问题的社区项目。
J Prev Interv Community. 2015;43(2):83-94. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2015.973248.
6
Understanding the rural food environment--perspectives of low-income parents.了解农村食物环境——低收入父母的观点
Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(2):1631. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
7
Food, food choice and nutrition promotion in a remote Australian Aboriginal community.澳大利亚一个偏远原住民社区的食物、食物选择与营养促进
Aust J Prim Health. 2014;20(4):365-72. doi: 10.1071/PY14033.
8
Developing sustainable food supply chains.发展可持续的食品供应链。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 27;363(1492):849-61. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2187.
9
Nutrition environments in corner stores in Philadelphia.费城街角商店的营养环境。
Prev Med. 2013 Feb;56(2):149-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.12.007. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
10
The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion.《渥太华促进健康宪章》
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 1992;44:1-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumer nutrition environment measurements for nutrient-dense food availability and food sustainability: a scoping review.针对营养丰富食品的可获得性和食品可持续性的消费者营养环境测量:一项范围综述
Arch Public Health. 2024 Jan 15;82(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01231-y.
2
Differentials and predictors of food insecurity among Federally Qualified Health Center target populations in Philadelphia: a cross-sectional study.费城联邦合格健康中心目标人群中粮食不安全的差异和预测因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 10;23(1):1323. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16208-3.
3
Food Deserts Increase Readmission After Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study.
癌症患者食管癌切除术后因“食物荒漠”而再次入院的情况增加:一项多机构研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Aug;116(2):246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.04.015. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
4
Residing in a food desert is associated with an increased risk of readmission following esophagectomy for cancer.居住在食物荒漠地区与食管癌切除术后癌症再入院风险增加有关。
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Jun;14(6):1854-1868. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1637.
5
Understanding stigma and food inequity: a conceptual framework to inform research, intervention, and policy.理解耻辱感与食物不平等:一个为研究、干预及政策提供信息的概念框架。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Dec 31;10(6):1350-1357. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa087.
6
Food Access 3.0: Insights From Post-Katrina New Orleans on an Evolving Approach to Food Inequities.食物获取3.0:卡特里娜飓风后新奥尔良对解决食物不平等问题的不断演变方法的见解。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(10):1495-1497. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305779.
7
How to increase community participation capacity in food environment policymaking: Results of a scoping review.如何提高社区在食品环境政策制定中的参与能力:一项范围综述的结果
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Mar 9;34:18. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.18. eCollection 2020.
8
The changing landscape of food deserts.食物荒漠不断变化的格局。
UNSCN Nutr. 2019 Summer;44:46-53.
9
Aligning Programs and Policies to Support Food Security and Public Health Goals in the United States.调整项目和政策,以支持美国的食品安全和公共卫生目标。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:319-337. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044132. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
10
A multi-stakeholder evaluation of the Baltimore City virtual supermarket program.巴尔的摩市虚拟超市项目的多方利益相关者评估。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Oct 23;17(1):837. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4864-9.