Southern New Hampshire Medical Center, Nashua, NH, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Feb 1;37(3):E163-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ce9a7.
A cadaveric biomechanical experiment was conducted to assess the range of motion (ROM) and screw strain at S1 in a long instrumented spinal fusion construct to compare the effects of various surgical strategies for L5-S1 stabilization.
To directly quantify and compare S1 screw strains and lumbosacral ROM for 4 different L2-S1 posterior segmental instrumented fusion constructs: an L2-S1 pedicle screw (PS) construct alone and PS with each of 3 different augmentations, anterior lumbar intebody fusion (ALIF), anterior axial interbody threaded rod (AxiaLITR), or iliac screws.
Iliac screws and anterior interbody devices are commonly used as augmentation to reduce the incidence of S1 screw loosening in long fusion constructs. Alternatives, such as AxiaLITR, may provide similar biomechanical advantages without many of the same long-term limitations and morbidities.
Pure moment flexibility testing was performed in 6 cadaveric lumbosacral spines. Specimens were tested with 4 instrumentation constructs: (1) PS L2-S1, (2) PS with ALIF, (3) PS with AxiaLITR, and (4) PS with iliac screws. Bilateral S1 PS were instrumented with strain gauges, directly measuring screw loading while simultaneously measuring L5-S1 ROM with a noncontact camera system.
Average S1 screw strains were the greatest with the PS group and were reduced by 38% with the ALIF group, 75% with the AxiaLITR group, and 78% with the iliac screw group in flexion-extension (P < 0.05). Similar trends were observed in torsion (P < 0.05). Strains in lateral bending were smaller in magnitude and were similar among all 4 constructs. The AxiaLITR and iliac screw groups demonstrated a similar ROM and significant reduction in ROM at L5-S1 compared with both the PS and ALIF groups (P ≤ 0.02 and P < 0.03).
The results of this study indicated that iliac screws and AxiaLITR provide similar stability at L5-S1, while significantly reducing the strain on the S1 screws.
进行了一项尸体生物力学实验,以评估 S1 在长节段脊柱融合固定结构中的活动范围(ROM)和螺钉应变,从而比较各种用于 L5-S1 稳定的手术策略的效果。
直接量化和比较 4 种不同的 L2-S1 后路节段性脊柱融合固定结构的 S1 螺钉应变和腰骶 ROM:单独的 L2-S1 椎弓根螺钉(PS)结构,以及 PS 与 3 种不同增强方式中的每一种,前路腰椎间融合(ALIF)、前路轴向椎间螺纹棒(AxiaLITR)或髂骨螺钉。
髂骨螺钉和前路椎间器械通常用作增强物,以降低长融合结构中 S1 螺钉松动的发生率。替代物,如 AxiaLITR,可能具有类似的生物力学优势,而没有许多相同的长期限制和发病率。
在 6 具尸体腰骶脊柱上进行纯力矩柔度测试。标本用 4 种器械结构进行测试:(1)L2-S1 PS,(2)PS 加 ALIF,(3)PS 加 AxiaLITR,和(4)PS 加髂骨螺钉。双侧 S1 PS 用应变计进行仪器化,在使用非接触式相机系统同时测量 L5-S1 ROM 的同时,直接测量螺钉负荷。
PS 组的 S1 螺钉应变最大,ALIF 组减少 38%,AxiaLITR 组减少 75%,髂骨螺钉组减少 78%,在屈伸(P < 0.05)。扭转(P < 0.05)也观察到类似的趋势。在侧屈中,应变幅度较小,且在所有 4 种结构中相似。AxiaLITR 和髂骨螺钉组与 PS 和 ALIF 组相比,L5-S1 的 ROM 相似,且 ROM 明显减少(P ≤ 0.02 和 P < 0.03)。
本研究结果表明,髂骨螺钉和 AxiaLITR 在 L5-S1 处提供相似的稳定性,同时显著减少 S1 螺钉的应变。