Laboratoire Mouvement et Perception, UMR 6152, CNRS-Université de la Méditerranée, 163 avenue de Luminy, CP 910, 13288, Marseille Cedex 9, France.
Eur Spine J. 2010 May;19(5):739-46. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1325-x. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
The aim was to determine the biomechanical processes involved in postural regulation when self-imposed disturbances occur in the seated position in the antero-posterior direction. Twelve female adolescents with right thoracic scoliosis (SG) (Cobb = 30.4 degrees +/- 9.7) and 15 control adolescents (CG) were included in this study. The ground reaction forces (GRF) were studied whilst the subjects maintained their balance in the sitting position on a seesaw. Six conditions were tested: eyes open and closed; with an additional load placed on the subject's right or left shoulder; and with an additional load on the subject's right or left pelvis. The SG showed significantly higher force amplitudes and variability and fewer oscillations than the CG in all the conditions. In the SG, the time analysis showed that the duration of the GRF was significantly higher in forward and left directions. Whatever the condition tested, the intra-group differences were not significant. The scoliotic patients in seated position were characterised by larger changes of the GRF, especially with a postural control in the forward and left directions, corresponding to that on the concave side of their spinal curvature. No significant differences were found to exist between the various conditions (load and unload, eyes open and eyes closed). Clinical tests and rehabilitation methods should include assessments of seated patients' spatio-temporal adaptation to GRF.
目的是确定在坐姿中发生前后方向的自施干扰时,参与姿势调节的生物力学过程。本研究纳入了 12 名右侧胸弯青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者(SG)(Cobb = 30.4 度 +/- 9.7)和 15 名对照组青少年(CG)。在跷跷板上保持坐姿平衡时,研究人员研究了受试者的地面反作用力(GRF)。共测试了 6 种情况:睁眼和闭眼;在受试者的右肩或左肩额外施加负荷;以及在受试者的右或左骨盆上额外施加负荷。SG 在所有情况下的力幅值和变异性均明显高于 CG,且摆动次数更少。在 SG 中,时间分析表明,在向前和向左方向上,GRF 的持续时间明显更高。无论测试何种条件,组内差异均无统计学意义。在坐姿中,脊柱侧凸患者的 GRF 变化较大,特别是在脊柱侧凸凹侧的前向和左向的姿势控制中,变化更大。在各种条件(加载和卸载、睁眼和闭眼)之间未发现显著差异。临床检查和康复方法应包括对坐姿患者的 GRF 时空适应能力进行评估。