• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协作倡议帮助终结长期无家可归状态(CICH)中的支持性住房方法。

Supportive housing approaches in the Collaborative Initiative to Help End Chronic Homelessness (CICH).

作者信息

Kresky-Wolff Marilyn, Larson Mary Jo, O'Brien Robert W, McGraw Sarah A

机构信息

The CDM Group, Inc., 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):213-25. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9206-y.

DOI:10.1007/s11414-009-9206-y
PMID:20195779
Abstract

The Federal Collaborative Initiative to Help End Chronic Homelessness funded 11 sites to expand permanent housing and offer supportive services to persons experiencing chronic homelessness and suffering from mental and substance use disorders. This study examines qualitative data on how the projects used US Department of Housing and Urban Development funding and three housing approaches (scattered units, congregate/clustered, or a combination) for rapid placement of clients. Each housing approach called for adaptations by the services teams and property personnel in order to support clients with independent living skills, prevent housing loss, and promote their overall health in line with Initiative goals. Property personnel reported taking on new roles with clients and forming new collaborative arrangements with services teams. The authors discuss the lessons reported by sites that were associated with housing configuration, type of lease, and role of property personnel.

摘要

联邦终结长期无家可归协作倡议资助了11个地点,以扩大永久性住房,并为长期无家可归且患有精神疾病和物质使用障碍的人提供支持性服务。本研究调查了有关这些项目如何使用美国住房和城市发展部资金以及三种住房安置方式(分散单元、集中/集群式或两者结合)来快速安置客户的定性数据。每种住房安置方式都要求服务团队和物业人员进行调整,以帮助客户掌握独立生活技能、防止失去住房,并根据倡议目标促进他们的整体健康。物业人员报告称,他们与客户建立了新的关系,并与服务团队形成了新的合作安排。作者讨论了各地点报告的与住房配置、租赁类型和物业人员角色相关的经验教训。

相似文献

1
Supportive housing approaches in the Collaborative Initiative to Help End Chronic Homelessness (CICH).协作倡议帮助终结长期无家可归状态(CICH)中的支持性住房方法。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):213-25. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9206-y.
2
Adopting best practices: lessons learned in the Collaborative Initiative to Help End Chronic Homelessness (CICH).采用最佳实践:在帮助终结长期无家可归协作倡议(CICH)中吸取的经验教训。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):197-212. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9173-3. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
3
A comparison of treatment outcomes among chronically homelessness adults receiving comprehensive housing and health care services versus usual local care.比较接受综合住房和医疗保健服务的慢性无家可归成年人与常规当地护理的治疗结果。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Nov;38(6):459-75. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0333-4.
4
Collaborative initiative to help end chronic homelessness: introduction.帮助终结长期无家可归状况的合作倡议:引言
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):149-66. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9175-1. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
5
Staffing challenges and strategies for organizations serving individuals who have experienced chronic homelessness.为曾长期无家可归者提供服务的组织所面临的人员配备挑战及策略。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):226-38. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9201-3. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
6
Permanent Supportive Housing With Housing First to Reduce Homelessness and Promote Health Among Homeless Populations With Disability: A Community Guide Systematic Review.《通过住房优先的永久性支持性住房减少残疾流浪人群的流浪现象并增进其健康:社区指南系统评价》。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Sep/Oct;26(5):404-411. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001219.
7
Services and supports for individuals with co-occurring disorders and long-term homelessness.为患有并发疾病和长期无家可归者提供的服务与支持。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):239-51. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9190-2. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
8
Integrating Permanent Supportive Housing and Co-Occurring Disorders Treatment for Individuals Who Are Homeless.为无家可归者整合永久性支持性住房与共病治疗。
J Dual Diagn. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):193-201. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2016.1174010. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
9
Permanent Supportive Housing and Specialized Co-Occurring Disorders Wraparound Services for Homeless Individuals.为无家可归者提供的永久性支持性住房及专门的并发障碍综合服务。
J Dual Diagn. 2018 Oct-Dec;14(4):247-256. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2018.1506195. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
10
Problems maintaining collaborative approaches with excluded populations in a randomised control trial: lessons learned implementing Housing First in France.在一项随机对照试验中,与被排斥人群保持合作方法方面存在问题:在法国实施“优先住房”项目中吸取的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Apr 19;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0305-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Easy to use and validated predictive models to identify beneficiaries experiencing homelessness in Medicaid administrative data.易于使用且经过验证的预测模型,可用于识别医疗补助管理数据中无家可归的受益人群。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58(4):882-893. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14143. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
The comparative effectiveness of different models of permanent supportive housing on problematic substance use, depression, and anxiety symptoms over time.不同模式的永久性支持性住房对物质使用问题、抑郁和焦虑症状随时间推移的比较效果。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2021;91(4):514-523. doi: 10.1037/ort0000550. Epub 2021 May 3.
3
The effect of a Housing First intervention on primary care retention among homeless individuals with mental illness.

本文引用的文献

1
Adopting best practices: lessons learned in the Collaborative Initiative to Help End Chronic Homelessness (CICH).采用最佳实践:在帮助终结长期无家可归协作倡议(CICH)中吸取的经验教训。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):197-212. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9173-3. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
2
Twelve-month client outcomes and service use in a multisite project for chronically homelessness adults.针对长期无家可归成年人的多地点项目中客户的一年期成果及服务使用情况
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):167-83. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9171-5. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
3
Collaborative initiative to help end chronic homelessness: introduction.
住房优先干预对有精神疾病的无家可归者在初级保健方面的保留效果。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246859. eCollection 2021.
4
Homelessness and self-rated health: evidence from a national survey of homeless people in Spain.无家可归与自评健康:来自西班牙全国无家可归者调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):1081. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7380-2.
5
Veterans' assignment to single-site versus scattered-site permanent supportive housing.退伍军人分配到单站点与分散站点永久性支持性住房。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(1):37-47. doi: 10.1037/ort0000380. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
6
Availability of comprehensive services in permanent supportive housing in Los Angeles.洛杉矶永久性支持性住房综合服务的可获得性。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Mar;26(2):207-213. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12510. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
7
Adults Experiencing Homelessness in the US-Mexico Border Region: A Photovoice Project.美国-墨西哥边境地区无家可归的成年人:一个摄影发声项目。
Front Public Health. 2017 May 19;5:113. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00113. eCollection 2017.
8
Comprehensive services delivery and emergency department use among chronically homeless adults.长期无家可归成年人的综合服务提供与急诊科利用情况
Psychol Serv. 2017 May;14(2):184-192. doi: 10.1037/ser0000111.
9
Identifying variability in permanent supportive housing: A comparative effectiveness approach to measuring health outcomes.识别永久性支持性住房中的差异:一种衡量健康结果的比较有效性方法。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2017;87(4):414-424. doi: 10.1037/ort0000232. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
10
The effect of incarceration on housing stability among homeless and vulnerably housed individuals in three Canadian cities: A prospective cohort study.加拿大三个城市中无家可归者和住房条件差的人群被监禁对住房稳定性的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Can J Public Health. 2017 Mar 1;107(6):e550-e555. doi: 10.17269/cjph.107.5607.
帮助终结长期无家可归状况的合作倡议:引言
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):149-66. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9175-1. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
4
Putting housing first, making housing last: housing policy for persons with severe mental illness.住房优先,住房兜底:针对重度精神疾病患者的住房政策
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;165(10):1242-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08020279.
5
Housing for people with mental illness: update of a report to the President's New Freedom Commission.为患有精神疾病者提供的住房:提交给总统新自由委员会的一份报告的更新内容
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Jul;58(7):907-13. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.7.907.
6
Housing First for long-term shelter dwellers with psychiatric disabilities in a suburban county: a four-year study of housing access and retention.郊区县为患有精神疾病的长期避难所居住者提供的“先住房后服务”模式:一项关于住房获取与保留的四年研究
J Prim Prev. 2007 Jul;28(3-4):265-79. doi: 10.1007/s10935-007-0093-9. Epub 2007 Jun 26.
7
Community-wide strategies for preventing homelessness: recent evidence.社区层面预防无家可归的策略:最新证据
J Prim Prev. 2007 Jul;28(3-4):213-28. doi: 10.1007/s10935-007-0094-8. Epub 2007 Jun 9.
8
Critical Time Intervention: an empirically supported model for preventing homelessness in high risk groups.关键时间干预:一种经实证支持的针对高危群体预防无家可归现象的模式。
J Prim Prev. 2007 Jul;28(3-4):295-312. doi: 10.1007/s10935-007-0099-3. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
9
Impact of permanent supportive housing on the use of acute care health services by homeless adults.永久性支持性住房对无家可归成年人急性护理医疗服务使用情况的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Jul;57(7):992-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.7.992.
10
An examination of fulfilled housing preferences and quality of life among homeless persons with mental illness and/or substance use disorders.对患有精神疾病和/或物质使用障碍的无家可归者中实现的住房偏好和生活质量的考察。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul;33(3):354-65. doi: 10.1007/s11414-006-9029-z.