Constitutional law -- free exercise clause -- Ninth Circuit rejects strict scrutiny for pharmacy dispensing requirement. -- Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 571 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2009).
出版信息
Harv Law Rev. 2009 Dec;123(2):596-603.
PMID:20196268
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Constitutional law -- free exercise clause -- Ninth Circuit rejects strict scrutiny for pharmacy dispensing requirement. -- Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 571 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2009).宪法——宗教信仰自由条款——第九巡回上诉法院驳回对药房配药要求的严格审查。——斯托曼斯公司诉塞莱基案，《联邦判例汇编》第3辑，第571卷，第960页（第九巡回上诉法院，2009年）
Harv Law Rev. 2009 Dec;123(2):596-603.
2
3
The limits of conscientious objection--may pharmacists refuse to fill prescriptions for emergency contraception?良心拒服兵役的限度——药剂师可以拒绝为紧急避孕药开处方吗？
N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 4;351(19):2008-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb042263.
4
Pharmacists' rights at front of new debate; because of beliefs, some refuse to fill birth control prescriptions.
Washington Post. 2005 Mar 28:A1, A10.
5
Conscience in context: pharmacist rights and the eroding moral marketplace.情境中的良知：药剂师权利与道德市场的侵蚀
Stanford Law Pol Rev. 2006;17(1):83-119.
6
Moralists at the pharmacy.药房里的道德家。
N Y Times Web. 2005 Apr 3:WK12.
7
Judicial diagnosis 'conscience' vs. care how refusal clauses are reshaping the rights revolution.司法诊断“良知”与关注拒绝条款如何重塑权利革命。
Med Health R I. 2005 Aug;88(8):279-81.
8
9
Dispensing with liberty: conscientious refusal and the "morning-after pill".摒弃自由：良心拒绝与“紧急避孕药”
J Med Philos. 2005 Dec;30(6):579-92. doi: 10.1080/03605310500421389.
10
Public health. Pharmacist refusals: a threat to women's health.
Science. 2005 Jun 10;308(5728):1557-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1114466.
Zotero 插件