Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.
Crit Care Resusc. 2010 Mar;12(1):62-6.
The demand for intensive care services is growing, and the cost of these services is increasing, with newer technologies consuming larger portions of the health care budget. We contend that both the costs and benefits of interventions must be considered to truly understand their value in critical care. Economic evaluations provide an explicit framework to compare the costs and benefits of an intervention. If these factors are not considered together, decisions may be made that do not result in the most efficient use of constrained resources. Despite limitations arising from variations in economic evaluation methodology, logistical complexity and problems of generalisability, the Australian trial environment provides an ideal opportunity to obtain robust economic data to help decision-making. Here, we outline the rationale for conducting economic evaluations in the critical care setting and argue that these evaluations need to be routinely incorporated into all large-scale clinical trials.
对重症监护服务的需求正在增长,而这些服务的成本也在增加,新技术消耗了更大比例的医疗保健预算。我们认为,必须考虑干预措施的成本和收益,才能真正了解其在重症监护中的价值。经济评估为比较干预措施的成本和收益提供了一个明确的框架。如果不一起考虑这些因素,可能会做出不符合资源有效利用的决策。尽管经济评估方法的差异、后勤复杂性和普遍性问题带来了限制,但澳大利亚的试验环境为获取有助于决策的可靠经济数据提供了一个理想的机会。在这里,我们概述了在重症监护环境中进行经济评估的基本原理,并认为这些评估需要常规纳入所有大规模临床试验中。