Ramos Maria Lucia Teixeira, Ferraz Marcos Bosi, Sesso Ricardo
São Luiz Hospital, R.Traipú, 568 ap. 131, Pacaembu, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01235-000, Brazil.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 Nov-Dec;39(3):255-67. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.001.
The goal of the study was to appraise the economic evaluations published between 1980 and 2004 of "home care" for the elderly, focusing on the methodological aspects. MEDLINE was searched to identify and assess economic evaluations (defined as an analysis comparing two or more strategies, involving the assessment of both costs and consequences) related to "home care" exclusively for the elderly (65 years or more) and to critically appraise the methodology using five accepted principles used worldwide for conducting economic evaluations. Twenty-four economic evaluations of "home care" for the elderly were identified and the articles were assessed. All five principles were satisfactorily addressed in two studies (8.3%), four principles in four studies (16.7%), three principles in five studies (20.8%), two principles in eight studies (33.3%) and only one principle in five studies (20.8%). A disparity in the methodology of writing economic evaluations compromises the comparisons among outcomes and lately jeopardizes decisions on the choice of the most appropriate healthcare interventions. The methodological principles represent important guidelines but the discussion of the context of the economic evaluation and the special characteristics of some services and populations should be considered for the appropriate use of economic evaluations.
该研究的目的是评估1980年至2004年间发表的针对老年人“居家护理”的经济评价,重点关注方法学方面。通过检索MEDLINE来识别和评估专门针对65岁及以上老年人的“居家护理”相关的经济评价(定义为比较两种或更多策略的分析,涉及成本和后果评估),并使用全球公认的五项进行经济评价的原则对方法学进行批判性评价。共识别出24项针对老年人“居家护理”的经济评价并对文章进行了评估。两项研究(8.3%)令人满意地涵盖了所有五项原则,四项研究(16.7%)涵盖了四项原则,五项研究(20.8%)涵盖了三项原则,八项研究(33.3%)涵盖了两项原则,五项研究(20.8%)仅涵盖了一项原则。经济评价撰写方法上的差异影响了结果之间的比较,最终危及关于选择最合适医疗保健干预措施的决策。这些方法学原则是重要的指导方针,但为了恰当地使用经济评价,应考虑经济评价背景以及某些服务和人群的特殊特征的讨论。