Suppr超能文献

正畸治疗后牙釉质表面粗糙度。

Surface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatment.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Mar;137(3):368-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

After fixed appliance treatment, one concern is to restore the enamel surface as closely to its original state as possible. A variety of cleanup processes are available, but all are time-consuming and carry some risk of enamel damage. The purpose of this study was to examine tooth surfaces restored with different cleanup protocols.

METHODS

Ninety-nine premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were used. The 2 materials tested were Sof-Lex disks (3 M ESPE AG, Seefeld, Germany) and fiberglass burs (Stain Buster, Carbotech, Ganges, France). These were used alone and in combination with high- and low-speed handpieces, with which they were also compared. Eight groups were ultimately tested. All groups were compared with intact enamel, which served as the control group. From each group, 10 samples were examined with profilometry and 1 with scanning electron microscopy. Adhesive remnant index scores were recorded to ensure equal distributions for the groups. The time required for the cleanup processes and profilometry test results were also recorded.

RESULTS

The fastest procedure was performed with high-speed handpieces, followed by low-speed handpieces. Sof-Lex disks and fiberglass burs required more time than carbide burs but did not result in significantly longer times for the cleanup procedure when combined with tungsten carbide-driven low- or high-speed handpieces or when used alone with low-speed handpieces. Although Sof-Lex disks were the most successful for restoring the enamel, it was not necessary to restore the enamel to its original surface condition. Generally, all enamel surface-roughness parameters were increased when compared with the values of intact enamel. The average roughness and maximum roughness depth measurements with Sof-Lex disks were statistically similar to measurements of intact enamel.

CONCLUSIONS

No cleanup procedure used in this study restored the enamel to its original roughness. The most successful was Sof-Lex disks, which restored the enamel closer to its original roughness.

摘要

简介

固定矫正治疗后,人们关注的一个问题是尽可能地恢复釉质表面的原始状态。有多种清洁处理方法,但都耗时且存在一定的釉质损伤风险。本研究的目的是研究不同清洁方案修复后的牙面。

方法

共使用 99 颗因正畸需要而拔除的前磨牙。测试的两种材料为 Sof-Lex 盘(3M ESPE AG,瑞士 Seefeld)和玻璃纤维车针(Stain Buster,法国 Carbotech,Ganges)。单独使用这些材料以及将它们与高速和低速手机结合使用,并将其与这些方法进行比较。最终共测试了 8 个组。所有组均与完整釉质进行比较,后者作为对照组。从每组中选取 10 个样本进行轮廓测量,1 个样本进行扫描电子显微镜检查。记录黏附残余指数评分,以确保组间分布均匀。还记录了清洁过程和轮廓测量试验所需的时间。

结果

最快的程序是使用高速手机完成的,其次是低速手机。Sof-Lex 盘和玻璃纤维车针所需时间比碳化硅车针长,但当与碳化钨驱动的低速或高速手机组合使用或单独与低速手机一起使用时,清洁过程所需的时间并没有显著延长。尽管 Sof-Lex 盘在恢复釉质方面最成功,但并不需要将釉质恢复到原始表面状态。一般来说,与完整釉质相比,所有釉质表面粗糙度参数都增加了。Sof-Lex 盘的平均粗糙度和最大粗糙度深度测量值与完整釉质的测量值统计学相似。

结论

本研究中使用的任何清洁程序都未将釉质恢复到原始粗糙度。最成功的是 Sof-Lex 盘,它使釉质更接近原始粗糙度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验