Suppr超能文献

三种正畸托槽去除后残留粘结剂去除方法的比较评价。

Comparative evaluation of three methods of adhesive remnant removal after orthodontic bracket debonding.

机构信息

Sahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics (Yazd, Iran).

出版信息

Dental Press J Orthod. 2023 Mar 27;27(6):e2220352. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.27.6.e2220352.oar. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effects of three methods of adhesive remnant removal (carbide bur and low speed handpiece, carbide bur and high speed handpiece, and zircon-rich glass fiber reinforced composite bur), after orthodontic bracket debonding, on tooth color and enamel surface roughness.

METHODS

Ninety sound premolar teeth were selected. The baseline tooth color was assessed using Vita spectrophotometer. The teeth were subjected to bracket bonding processes and then randomly divided into three equal groups. In each group, composite remnant was removed by one of the three methods of adhesive removal, and the teeth were then subjected to color assessment again. To measure the surface roughness, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with x400 magnification was used.

RESULTS

ANOVA showed that the effect of the three methods of adhesive remnant removal on ∆L, ∆b and ∆E was statistically significant (p=0.01), but without significant effect on ∆a. Comparison of the means showed that composite bur and high speed carbide bur yielded the highest ∆E (p=0.05), and had a significant difference when compared to carbide bur and low speed handpiece. The highest ∆L and ∆b values belonged to samples approached with composite bur and carbide bur with high speed handpiece, respectively. SEM analysis showed that the composite bur created a very smooth surface, compared to the other two methods.

CONCLUSION

Zircon-rich glass fiber reinforced composite created the smoothest enamel surface and highest color change, when compared to the other two methods.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估三种不同的托槽残留粘接剂去除方法(碳化硅车针和低速手机、碳化硅车针和高速手机、富锆玻璃纤维增强复合材料车针)对托槽去除后牙齿颜色和釉质表面粗糙度的影响。

方法

选择 90 颗健康的前磨牙。使用 Vita 分光光度计评估基线牙齿颜色。对牙齿进行托槽粘接处理后,随机分为三组。每组用三种去粘接剂方法之一去除复合树脂残留,然后再次进行颜色评估。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)以 400 倍放大倍数测量表面粗糙度。

结果

方差分析显示,三种去除残留粘接剂的方法对∆L、∆b 和∆E 的影响具有统计学意义(p=0.01),但对∆a 没有显著影响。均值比较显示,高速碳化硅车针和复合树脂车针去除粘接剂后的∆E 最高(p=0.05),与碳化硅车针和低速手机相比有显著差异。∆L 和∆b 值最高的样本分别采用复合树脂车针和高速碳化硅车针去除粘接剂。SEM 分析显示,与其他两种方法相比,复合树脂车针可产生更光滑的釉质表面。

结论

与其他两种方法相比,富锆玻璃纤维增强复合材料车针去除粘接剂后可产生最光滑的釉质表面和最高的颜色变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验