Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr;3(2):97-104. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.916676. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
Septal reduction for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may be performed by surgical myectomy or alcohol septal ablation (ASA). Unlike surgical myectomy, ASA creates an intramyocardial scar that may potentiate the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD).
Systematic reviews for ASA and surgical myectomy were performed. Study selection and data extraction were completed independently by 2 investigators. Comparative data analyses were completed using a random effects model and regression analysis. Kappa statistics for agreement on initial study inclusion were high for both ASA (0.78; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.88) and surgical myectomy studies (0.95; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.0). Nineteen ASA studies (2207 patients) and 8 surgical myectomy studies (1887 patients) were included. Median follow-up was shorter for ASA than for myectomy studies (51 versus 1266 patient-years; P<0.001). For ASA and surgical myectomy, unadjusted rates (events/patient-years) of all-cause mortality (0.021 versus 0.018, respectively; P=0.37) and SCD (0.004 versus 0.003, respectively; P=0.36) were similar. Patients treated with ASA were older (weighted mean, 55 versus 44 years; P<0.001) and had less septal hypertrophy (weighted mean, 21 versus 23 mm; P<0.001) compared with those treated with myectomy. After adjustment for available baseline characteristics, odds ratios for treatment effect on all-cause mortality and SCD were 0.28 (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.46) and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.97), respectively, favoring ASA.
Rates of all-cause mortality and SCD after both ASA and surgical myectomy were similarly low. Adjusted for baseline characteristics, the odds ratios for treatment effect on all-cause mortality and SCD were lower in ASA cohorts compared with surgical myectomy cohorts.
对于梗阻性肥厚型心肌病,可通过外科心肌切除术或酒精室间隔消融术(ASA)进行室间隔减容术。与外科心肌切除术不同,ASA 会造成心肌内瘢痕,这可能会增加室性心律失常和心脏性猝死(SCD)的风险。
对 ASA 和外科心肌切除术进行了系统评价。两名研究者独立完成了研究选择和数据提取。使用随机效应模型和回归分析完成了比较数据分析。对于 ASA(0.78;95%CI,0.68 至 0.88)和外科心肌切除术研究(0.95;95%CI,0.84 至 1.0),最初研究纳入的一致性kappa 统计值均较高。纳入了 19 项 ASA 研究(2207 例患者)和 8 项外科心肌切除术研究(1887 例患者)。ASA 研究的中位随访时间短于外科心肌切除术研究(51 与 1266 患者年;P<0.001)。对于 ASA 和外科心肌切除术,全因死亡率(分别为 0.021 和 0.018,事件/患者年;P=0.37)和 SCD(分别为 0.004 和 0.003,事件/患者年;P=0.36)的未调整发生率相似。ASA 治疗组患者年龄较大(加权平均值,55 与 44 岁;P<0.001),室间隔肥厚程度较轻(加权平均值,21 与 23mm;P<0.001)。在调整了可用的基线特征后,全因死亡率和 SCD 的治疗效果的比值比分别为 0.28(95%CI,0.16 至 0.46)和 0.32(95%CI,0.11 至 0.97),均有利于 ASA。
ASA 和外科心肌切除术治疗后,全因死亡率和 SCD 的发生率均较低。调整了基线特征后,ASA 队列与外科心肌切除术队列相比,全因死亡率和 SCD 的治疗效果的比值比较低。