van Zanten A P, Twijnstra A, Ongerboer de Visser B W, van Heerde P, Hart A A, Nooyen W J
Municipal Hospital, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991 Feb;54(2):119-23. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.54.2.119.
The results of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biochemical markers were compared with conventional CSF cytology in patients treated for leptomeningeal metastases from extra cranial malignancies. For lumbar CSF, before treatment, no statistically significant difference of the probabilities of being positive was found between CSF cytology and a classification by linear discriminant analysis, based on patient's age, of beta-glucuronidase and beta 2-microglobulin. During treatment, classification by linear discriminant analysis was found more often positive than cytology. Possible mechanisms for this difference are discussed. For ventricular CSF a correlation was found between CSF cytology and beta-glucuronidase for solid tumours, and between CSF cytology and beta 2-microglobulin for haematological malignancies. Reference values for ventricular protein, CEA beta-glucuronidase and beta 2-microglobulin were obtained for cytological negative samples.
对接受颅外恶性肿瘤软脑膜转移治疗的患者,将脑脊液(CSF)生化标志物的结果与传统CSF细胞学结果进行了比较。对于腰椎脑脊液,治疗前,基于患者年龄的β-葡萄糖醛酸酶和β2-微球蛋白线性判别分析分类与CSF细胞学检查之间,在阳性概率上未发现统计学显著差异。治疗期间,发现线性判别分析分类比细胞学检查更常呈阳性。讨论了这种差异的可能机制。对于脑室脑脊液,在实体瘤中发现CSF细胞学与β-葡萄糖醛酸酶之间存在相关性,在血液系统恶性肿瘤中发现CSF细胞学与β2-微球蛋白之间存在相关性。获得了细胞学检查阴性样本的脑室蛋白、癌胚抗原、β-葡萄糖醛酸酶和β2-微球蛋白的参考值。