Suppr超能文献

成人对成人活体肝移植队列研究(A2ALL)与 SRTR 美国移植登记处的数据库比较。

Database comparison of the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study (A2ALL) and the SRTR U.S. Transplant Registry.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2010 Jul;10(7):1621-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03039.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

Abstract

Data submitted by transplant programs to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) are used by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) for policy development, performance evaluation and research. This study compared OPTN/SRTR data with data extracted from medical records by research coordinators from the nine-center A2ALL study. A2ALL data were collected independently of OPTN data submission (48 data elements among 785 liver transplant candidates/recipients; 12 data elements among 386 donors). At least 90% agreement occurred between OPTN/SRTR and A2ALL for 11/29 baseline recipient elements, 4/19 recipient transplant or follow-up elements and 6/12 donor elements. For the remaining recipient and donor elements, >10% of values were missing in OPTN/SRTR but present in A2ALL, confirming that missing data were largely avoidable. Other than variables required for allocation, the percentage missing varied widely by center. These findings support an expanded focus on data quality control by OPTN/SRTR for a broader variable set than those used for allocation. Center-specific monitoring of missing values could substantially improve the data.

摘要

移植项目向器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)提交的数据被移植受者科学登记处(SRTR)用于政策制定、绩效评估和研究。本研究将 OPTN/SRTR 数据与来自九个中心 A2ALL 研究的研究协调员从病历中提取的数据进行了比较。A2ALL 数据的收集独立于 OPTN 数据提交(785 例肝移植候选者/受者中有 48 个数据元素;386 例供者中有 12 个数据元素)。对于 11/29 个基线受者元素、4/19 个受者移植或随访元素和 6/12 个供者元素,OPTN/SRTR 与 A2ALL 之间至少有 90%的一致性。对于其余的受者和供者元素,OPTN/SRTR 中缺失的数值大于 10%,但在 A2ALL 中存在,这证实了缺失的数据在很大程度上是可以避免的。除了分配所需的变量外,中心之间缺失数据的百分比差异很大。这些发现支持 OPTN/SRTR 扩大数据质量控制的重点,涵盖比分配更广泛的变量集。针对缺失值的特定中心监测可以大大改善数据。

相似文献

1
Database comparison of the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study (A2ALL) and the SRTR U.S. Transplant Registry.
Am J Transplant. 2010 Jul;10(7):1621-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03039.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
4
Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on transplantation in the United States.
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2013 Apr;27(2):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
5
Acute Rejection Increases Risk of Graft Failure and Death in Recent Liver Transplant Recipients.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;15(4):584-593.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.035. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
6
OPTN/SRTR 2020 Annual Data Report: Living Donor Collective.
Am J Transplant. 2022 Mar;22 Suppl 2:553-586. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16983.
7
The impact of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation on transplant center outcomes reporting.
Clin Transplant. 2017 Nov;31(11). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13120. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
8
Linkage of the CF Foundation Patient Registry with the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database.
J Cyst Fibros. 2025 Jan;24(1):112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2024.09.015. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
10
Comparison of Cancer Diagnoses Between the US Solid Organ Transplant Registry and Linked Central Cancer Registries.
Am J Transplant. 2016 Oct;16(10):2986-2993. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13818. Epub 2016 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving data quality in observational research studies: Report of the Cure Glomerulonephropathy (CureGN) network.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Feb 17;22:100749. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100749. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Grade 1 Acute on Chronic Liver Failure Is a Predictor for Subsequent Grade 3 Failure.
Hepatology. 2020 Jul;72(1):230-239. doi: 10.1002/hep.31012. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
3
4
Association of Cold Ischemia Time With Acute Renal Transplant Rejection.
Transplantation. 2018 Jul;102(7):1188-1194. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002106.
7
Acute Rejection Increases Risk of Graft Failure and Death in Recent Liver Transplant Recipients.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;15(4):584-593.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.035. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
8
Validating Early Post-Transplant Outcomes Reported for Recipients of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):324-31. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06950615. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
Defining long-term outcomes with living donor liver transplantation in North America.
Ann Surg. 2015 Sep;262(3):465-75; discussion 473-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001383.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival benefit-based deceased-donor liver allocation.
Am J Transplant. 2009 Apr;9(4 Pt 2):970-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02571.x.
2
Incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection in recipients undergoing adult living donor or deceased donor liver transplantation.
Am J Transplant. 2009 Feb;9(2):301-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02487.x. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
3
Recipient morbidity after living and deceased donor liver transplantation: findings from the A2ALL Retrospective Cohort Study.
Am J Transplant. 2008 Dec;8(12):2569-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02440.x. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
4
Donor morbidity after living donation for liver transplantation.
Gastroenterology. 2008 Aug;135(2):468-76. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.018. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
5
Novel methods for tracking long-term maintenance immunosuppression regimens.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Jan;3(1):117-24. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02790707. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
6
Improvement in survival associated with adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.
Gastroenterology. 2007 Dec;133(6):1806-13. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
7
Outcomes of donor evaluation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.
Hepatology. 2007 Nov;46(5):1476-84. doi: 10.1002/hep.21845.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验