Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Am J Transplant. 2010 Jul;10(7):1621-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03039.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
Data submitted by transplant programs to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) are used by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) for policy development, performance evaluation and research. This study compared OPTN/SRTR data with data extracted from medical records by research coordinators from the nine-center A2ALL study. A2ALL data were collected independently of OPTN data submission (48 data elements among 785 liver transplant candidates/recipients; 12 data elements among 386 donors). At least 90% agreement occurred between OPTN/SRTR and A2ALL for 11/29 baseline recipient elements, 4/19 recipient transplant or follow-up elements and 6/12 donor elements. For the remaining recipient and donor elements, >10% of values were missing in OPTN/SRTR but present in A2ALL, confirming that missing data were largely avoidable. Other than variables required for allocation, the percentage missing varied widely by center. These findings support an expanded focus on data quality control by OPTN/SRTR for a broader variable set than those used for allocation. Center-specific monitoring of missing values could substantially improve the data.
移植项目向器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)提交的数据被移植受者科学登记处(SRTR)用于政策制定、绩效评估和研究。本研究将 OPTN/SRTR 数据与来自九个中心 A2ALL 研究的研究协调员从病历中提取的数据进行了比较。A2ALL 数据的收集独立于 OPTN 数据提交(785 例肝移植候选者/受者中有 48 个数据元素;386 例供者中有 12 个数据元素)。对于 11/29 个基线受者元素、4/19 个受者移植或随访元素和 6/12 个供者元素,OPTN/SRTR 与 A2ALL 之间至少有 90%的一致性。对于其余的受者和供者元素,OPTN/SRTR 中缺失的数值大于 10%,但在 A2ALL 中存在,这证实了缺失的数据在很大程度上是可以避免的。除了分配所需的变量外,中心之间缺失数据的百分比差异很大。这些发现支持 OPTN/SRTR 扩大数据质量控制的重点,涵盖比分配更广泛的变量集。针对缺失值的特定中心监测可以大大改善数据。