• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将美国移植登记处与行政索赔数据相连接:拓展移植研究的潜力。

Linking the US transplant registry to administrative claims data: expanding the potential of transplant research.

作者信息

Gilmore Amanda S, Helderman J Harold, Ricci Jean-Francois, Ryskina Kira L, Feng Sandy, Kang Ning, Legorreta Antonio P

机构信息

Health Benchmarks, Inc., Woodland Hills, California, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2007 Jun;45(6):529-36. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180326121.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180326121
PMID:17515780
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In the United States, data on transplanted and waitlisted patients collected by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) have been widely used in transplantation research. Administrative claims data, collected by health plans for reimbursement purposes, are also commonly used in health-services research. This study linked OPTN and private payer claims data to assess the relationship between data elements common to both sources.

METHODS

All transplanted or waitlisted patients in the registry were considered for inclusion. A multistep match algorithm was employed to link OPTN and payer data from years 1995 to 2004. Variables common to both datasets that contained relevant information for similar time periods were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 21,419 solid organ transplant recipients and 8808 waitlist patients were included in the final linked database. Organ type and demographic variable distributions in the linked dataset were similar to the overall OPTN database. Using claims as the reference group, sensitivity and specificity values were on average 0.72 and 0.69, respectively, and were highest for the indicators of immunosuppression use at discharge and follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This comparison of payer data with information reported by transplant centers to the OPTN provides important insight into the value of both data sources. Using administrative claims to augment the registry data with utilization and cost information will be useful for evaluation of both economic and clinical endpoints in solid organ transplantation.

摘要

目的

在美国,器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)收集的移植患者和等待名单上患者的数据已广泛用于移植研究。健康计划为报销目的收集的行政索赔数据也常用于卫生服务研究。本研究将OPTN数据与私人支付方索赔数据相链接,以评估两个数据源共有的数据元素之间的关系。

方法

登记处所有接受移植或在等待名单上的患者均被纳入研究。采用多步骤匹配算法将1995年至2004年的OPTN数据与支付方数据相链接。对两个数据集在相似时间段内包含相关信息的共同变量进行比较。

结果

最终的链接数据库共纳入了21419名实体器官移植受者和8808名等待名单上的患者。链接数据集中的器官类型和人口统计学变量分布与整个OPTN数据库相似。以索赔数据作为参照组,敏感性和特异性值平均分别为0.72和0.69,且在出院时和随访时免疫抑制使用指标方面最高。

结论

将支付方数据与移植中心向OPTN报告的数据进行比较,为了解这两个数据源的价值提供了重要见解。利用行政索赔数据,用利用情况和成本信息来补充登记数据,将有助于评估实体器官移植中的经济和临床终点。

相似文献

1
Linking the US transplant registry to administrative claims data: expanding the potential of transplant research.将美国移植登记处与行政索赔数据相连接:拓展移植研究的潜力。
Med Care. 2007 Jun;45(6):529-36. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180326121.
2
Agreement of immunosuppression regimens described in Medicare pharmacy claims with the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network survey.医疗保险药房理赔中描述的免疫抑制方案与器官获取与移植网络调查的一致性。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Aug;17(8):2299-306. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006030258. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
3
The UNOS OPTN (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network) waiting list: 1988 through November 30, 1992.美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)器官获取与移植网络等待名单:1988年至1992年11月30日。
Clin Transpl. 1992:61-75.
4
The UNOS OPTN waiting list from 1988 to 1993.1988年至1993年的器官共享联合网络(UNOS)器官分配等候名单。
Clin Transpl. 1993:71-83.
5
Administrative and claims records as sources of health care cost data.作为医疗保健成本数据来源的行政和理赔记录。
Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7 Suppl 1):S51-5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819c95aa.
6
Claims data linked to hospital registry data enhance evaluation of the quality of care of breast cancer.索赔数据与医院注册数据相关联,可以提高乳腺癌护理质量的评估。
J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun 1;101(7):593-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.21528.
7
Kidney transplantation in the United States.美国的肾脏移植
Clin Transpl. 2008:1-18.
8
Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on transplantation in the United States.美国移植受者科学登记处:收集、分析和报告美国移植数据。
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2013 Apr;27(2):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
9
The OPTN waiting list, 1988-2000.器官共享联合网络等待名单,1988 - 2000年。
Clin Transpl. 2001:73-85.
10
Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR).向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)和国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的美国胰腺移植病例的结果。
Clin Transpl. 2008:45-56.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of solid organ transplantation on sexual dysfunction and infertility in older men and women: A Claims Based Study.实体器官移植对老年男性和女性性功能障碍及不孕不育的影响:一项基于索赔数据的研究。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01127-1.
2
Linking Trauma Registry Patients With Insurance Claims: Creating a Longitudinal Patient Record.将创伤登记患者与保险索赔联系起来:创建纵向患者记录。
J Surg Res. 2024 Mar;295:274-280. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.002. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
3
Expanding analytic possibilities in pediatric solid organ transplantation through linkage of administrative and clinical registry databases.
通过行政与临床登记数据库的联动拓展儿科实体器官移植的分析可能性。
Pediatr Transplant. 2019 May;23(3):e13379. doi: 10.1111/petr.13379. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
4
A unique linkage of administrative and clinical registry databases to expand analytic possibilities in pediatric heart transplantation research.行政与临床登记数据库的独特联动,以拓展儿科心脏移植研究中的分析可能性。
Am Heart J. 2017 Dec;194:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
5
Big data in organ transplantation: registries and administrative claims.器官移植中的大数据:登记处与行政索赔数据
Am J Transplant. 2014 Aug;14(8):1723-30. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12777.
6
Validating posttransplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence data in the United Network for Organ Sharing database.验证美国器官共享网络数据库中的肝移植后肝细胞癌复发数据。
Liver Transpl. 2013 Dec;19(12):1318-23. doi: 10.1002/lt.23735. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
7
Database comparison of the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study (A2ALL) and the SRTR U.S. Transplant Registry.成人对成人活体肝移植队列研究(A2ALL)与 SRTR 美国移植登记处的数据库比较。
Am J Transplant. 2010 Jul;10(7):1621-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03039.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
8
Early outcomes of thymoglobulin and basiliximab induction in kidney transplantation: application of statistical approaches to reduce bias in observational comparisons.肾移植中胸腺球蛋白和巴利昔单抗诱导治疗的早期结果:应用统计学方法减少观察性比较中的偏倚
Transplantation. 2009 May 27;87(10):1520-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a484d7.
9
Variations in the risk for cerebrovascular events after kidney transplant compared with experience on the waiting list and after graft failure.肾移植后脑血管事件风险与等待名单及移植失败后的情况相比的差异。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Jul;3(4):1090-101. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03080707. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
10
Novel methods for tracking long-term maintenance immunosuppression regimens.追踪长期维持免疫抑制方案的新方法。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Jan;3(1):117-24. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02790707. Epub 2007 Dec 12.