Baker Institute for Animal Health, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14853, USA.
J Virol. 2010 May;84(10):4969-78. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02623-09. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
Canine parvovirus (CPV) and its relative feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) bind the transferrin receptor type 1 (TfR) to infect their host cells but show differences in the interactions with the feline and canine TfRs that determine viral host range and tissue tropism. We changed apical and protease-like domain residues by introducing point mutations and adding or removing glycosylation signals, and we then examined the interactions of those mutant TfRs with the capsids. Most substitutions had little effect on virus binding and uptake. However, mutations of several sites in the apical domain of the receptor either prevented binding to the capsids or reduced the affinity of receptor binding to various degrees. Glycans within the virus binding face of the apical domain also controlled capsid binding. CPV, but not the related feline parvovirus, could use receptors containing a canine TfR-specific glycosylation to mediate efficient infection, while addition of other N-linked glycosylation sites into the virus binding face of the feline apical domain reduced or eliminated both binding and infection. Replacement of critical feline TfR residue 221 with every amino acid had effects on binding and infection which were significantly associated with the biochemical properties of the residue replaced. Receptors with reduced affinities mostly showed proportional changes in their ability to mediate infection. Testing feline TfR variants for their binding and uptake patterns in cells showed that low-affinity versions bound fewer capsids and also differed in attachment to the cell surface and filopodia, but transport to the perinuclear endosome was similar.
犬细小病毒 (CPV) 和相关的猫泛白细胞减少症病毒 (FPV) 通过结合转铁蛋白受体 1 (TfR) 来感染宿主细胞,但在与猫和犬 TfR 的相互作用方面存在差异,这些差异决定了病毒的宿主范围和组织嗜性。我们通过引入点突变和添加或去除糖基化信号改变了顶端和蛋白酶样结构域的残基,然后检查了这些突变 TfR 与衣壳的相互作用。大多数取代对病毒结合和摄取几乎没有影响。然而,受体顶端结构域中几个位点的突变要么阻止了与衣壳的结合,要么不同程度地降低了受体结合的亲和力。顶端结构域中病毒结合面内的聚糖也控制着衣壳的结合。CPV 但不是相关的猫细小病毒,可以利用含有犬 TfR 特异性糖基化的受体来介导有效的感染,而在猫的顶端结构域的病毒结合面上添加其他 N 连接的糖基化位点,则会降低或消除结合和感染。用每个氨基酸替换关键的猫 TfR 残基 221 对结合和感染都有影响,这与被取代的残基的生化特性显著相关。亲和力降低的受体在介导感染的能力方面主要表现出比例变化。在细胞中测试猫 TfR 变体的结合和摄取模式表明,低亲和力的变体结合的衣壳较少,并且在与细胞表面和丝状伪足的附着方面也存在差异,但向核周内体的转运是相似的。