• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

热力学解析:模型化蛋白质结构中的错误如何影响结合亲和力预测?

Thermodynamic resolution: how do errors in modeled protein structures affect binding affinity predictions?

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.

出版信息

Proteins. 2010 May 15;78(7):1613-7. doi: 10.1002/prot.22691.

DOI:10.1002/prot.22691
PMID:20201067
Abstract

The present study addresses the effect of structural distortion, caused by protein modeling errors, on calculated binding affinities toward small molecules. The binding affinities to a total of 300 distorted structures based on five different protein-ligand complexes were evaluated to establish a broadly applicable relationship between errors in protein structure and errors in calculated binding affinities. Relatively accurate protein models (less than 2 A RMSD within the binding site) demonstrate a 14.78 (+/-7.5)% deviation in binding affinity from that calculated by using the corresponding crystal structure. For structures of 2-3 A, 3-4 A, and >4 A RMSD within the binding site, the error in calculated binding affinity increases to 20.8 (+/-5.98), 22.79 (+/-11.3), and 29.43 (+/-11.47)%, respectively. The results described here may be used in combination with other tools to evaluate the utility of modeled protein structures for drug development or other ligand-binding studies.

摘要

本研究探讨了由蛋白质建模误差引起的结构扭曲对小分子结合亲和力计算的影响。评估了总共 300 个基于 5 种不同蛋白-配体复合物的扭曲结构,以建立蛋白质结构误差与计算结合亲和力误差之间的广泛适用关系。相对准确的蛋白质模型(结合部位内 RMSD 小于 2 A)与使用相应晶体结构计算的结合亲和力偏差为 14.78(+/-7.5)%。对于结合部位内 RMSD 为 2-3 A、3-4 A 和>4 A 的结构,计算结合亲和力的误差分别增加到 20.8(+/-5.98)%、22.79(+/-11.3)%和 29.43(+/-11.47)%。这里描述的结果可以与其他工具结合使用,以评估建模蛋白结构在药物开发或其他配体结合研究中的效用。

相似文献

1
Thermodynamic resolution: how do errors in modeled protein structures affect binding affinity predictions?热力学解析:模型化蛋白质结构中的错误如何影响结合亲和力预测?
Proteins. 2010 May 15;78(7):1613-7. doi: 10.1002/prot.22691.
2
Molecular dynamics-solvated interaction energy studies of protein-protein interactions: the MP1-p14 scaffolding complex.蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用的分子动力学-溶剂化相互作用能研究:MP1-p14支架复合物
J Mol Biol. 2008 Jun 13;379(4):787-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.04.035. Epub 2008 Apr 20.
3
FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.FlexE:考虑蛋白质结构变异的高效分子对接
J Mol Biol. 2001 Apr 27;308(2):377-95. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4551.
4
Structural artifacts in protein-ligand X-ray structures: implications for the development of docking scoring functions.蛋白质-配体X射线结构中的结构假象:对对接评分函数开发的影响。
J Med Chem. 2009 Sep 24;52(18):5673-84. doi: 10.1021/jm8016464.
5
Protein imperfections: separating intrinsic from extrinsic variation of torsion angles.蛋白质缺陷:区分扭转角的内在变化与外在变化。
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2005 Jan;61(Pt 1):88-98. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904027325. Epub 2004 Dec 17.
6
A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.一种用于蛋白质-配体相互作用的通用快速评分函数:一种简化的势能方法。
J Med Chem. 1999 Mar 11;42(5):791-804. doi: 10.1021/jm980536j.
7
An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.使用包含800个蛋白质-配体复合物的PDBbind精制集对14种评分函数进行的广泛测试。
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004 Nov-Dec;44(6):2114-25. doi: 10.1021/ci049733j.
8
Carbohydrate-binding proteins: Dissecting ligand structures through solvent environment occupancy.碳水化合物结合蛋白:通过溶剂环境占有率剖析配体结构
J Phys Chem B. 2009 Jun 25;113(25):8717-24. doi: 10.1021/jp901196n.
9
EADock: docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization.EADock:通过多目标进化优化将小分子对接至蛋白质活性位点
Proteins. 2007 Jun 1;67(4):1010-25. doi: 10.1002/prot.21367.
10
Towards in silico lead optimization: scores from ensembles of protein/ligand conformations reliably correlate with biological activity.迈向计算机辅助先导化合物优化:蛋白质/配体构象集合的分数与生物活性可靠相关。
Proteins. 2007 Feb 1;66(2):375-87. doi: 10.1002/prot.21201.

引用本文的文献

1
Protein-Ligand Interaction Energies from Quantum-Chemical Fragmentation Methods: Upgrading the MFCC-Scheme with Many-Body Contributions.量子化学碎片方法计算蛋白-配体作用能:用多体贡献方法升级 MFCC 方案。
J Phys Chem B. 2024 Nov 28;128(47):11597-11606. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c05645. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
2
Insights into resistance mechanism of the macrolide biosensor protein MphR(A) binding to macrolide antibiotic erythromycin by molecular dynamics simulation.通过分子动力学模拟深入了解大环内酯生物传感器蛋白MphR(A)与大环内酯抗生素红霉素的结合抗性机制。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2015 Dec;29(12):1123-36. doi: 10.1007/s10822-015-9881-0. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
3
Structural characterization of bacterioferritin from Blastochloris viridis.
从绿眼虫中分离的菌质体铁蛋白的结构特征。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046992. Epub 2012 Oct 9.