Suppr超能文献

无现场有创设施医院收治的急性冠脉综合征患者入院时心源性休克的预测因素及院内结局

Predictors and in-hospital outcomes of cardiogenic shock on admission in patients with acute coronary syndromes admitted to hospitals without on-site invasive facilities.

作者信息

Dziewierz Artur, Siudak Zbigniew, Rakowski Tomasz, Dubiel Jacek S, Dudek Dariusz

机构信息

2nd Department of Cardiology.

出版信息

Acute Card Care. 2010 Mar;12(1):3-9. doi: 10.3109/17482941003637106.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to identify predictors of cardiogenic shock (CS) on admission and to asses associations between CS and real-life management patterns and outcomes in unselected cohort of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients admitted to hospitals without onsite invasive facilities.

METHODS

Data concerning in-hospital management and mortality of 56 (4.3%) patients with and 1257 (95.7%) without CS on hospital admission was assessed.

RESULTS

Prior myocardial infarction, prior heart failure symptoms, age, and diabetes mellitus were independently associated with increased risk of CS on admission. A total of 23.8% patients were transferred for invasive treatment during index hospital stay and the frequency of transfer was similar among patients with and without CS on admission (21.4% versus 23.9%; P = 0.75), but in the STEMI subgroup, patients with shock were transported less frequently (21.4% versus 43.8%; P = 0.0027). CS patients were less likely to receive guideline-recommended therapies including antiplatelet drugs, statins, and beta-blockers. In-hospital mortality was lower in non-shock patients (6.2% versus 63.6%; P < 0.001) and CS on admission was an independent predictor of in-hospital death.

CONCLUSIONS

CS on admission is an important determinant of treatment strategy selection and is associated with unfavorable prognosis of ACS patients admitted to hospitals without on-site invasive facilities.

摘要

背景

目的是确定急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者入院时心源性休克(CS)的预测因素,并评估CS与现实生活中的管理模式及结局之间的关联,这些患者来自未配备现场侵入性设备的医院。

方法

评估了56例(4.3%)入院时发生CS和1257例(95.7%)未发生CS的患者的院内管理及死亡率数据。

结果

既往心肌梗死、既往心力衰竭症状、年龄和糖尿病与入院时CS风险增加独立相关。共有23.8%的患者在索引住院期间被转运接受侵入性治疗,入院时发生CS和未发生CS的患者转运频率相似(21.4%对23.9%;P = 0.75),但在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)亚组中,休克患者的转运频率较低(21.4%对43.8%;P = 0.0027)。CS患者接受指南推荐治疗(包括抗血小板药物、他汀类药物和β受体阻滞剂)的可能性较小。非休克患者的院内死亡率较低(6.2%对63.6%;P < 0.001),入院时CS是院内死亡的独立预测因素。

结论

入院时CS是治疗策略选择的重要决定因素,并且与未配备现场侵入性设备的医院中ACS患者的不良预后相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验