• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无现场有创设施医院收治的急性冠脉综合征患者入院时心源性休克的预测因素及院内结局

Predictors and in-hospital outcomes of cardiogenic shock on admission in patients with acute coronary syndromes admitted to hospitals without on-site invasive facilities.

作者信息

Dziewierz Artur, Siudak Zbigniew, Rakowski Tomasz, Dubiel Jacek S, Dudek Dariusz

机构信息

2nd Department of Cardiology.

出版信息

Acute Card Care. 2010 Mar;12(1):3-9. doi: 10.3109/17482941003637106.

DOI:10.3109/17482941003637106
PMID:20201656
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to identify predictors of cardiogenic shock (CS) on admission and to asses associations between CS and real-life management patterns and outcomes in unselected cohort of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients admitted to hospitals without onsite invasive facilities.

METHODS

Data concerning in-hospital management and mortality of 56 (4.3%) patients with and 1257 (95.7%) without CS on hospital admission was assessed.

RESULTS

Prior myocardial infarction, prior heart failure symptoms, age, and diabetes mellitus were independently associated with increased risk of CS on admission. A total of 23.8% patients were transferred for invasive treatment during index hospital stay and the frequency of transfer was similar among patients with and without CS on admission (21.4% versus 23.9%; P = 0.75), but in the STEMI subgroup, patients with shock were transported less frequently (21.4% versus 43.8%; P = 0.0027). CS patients were less likely to receive guideline-recommended therapies including antiplatelet drugs, statins, and beta-blockers. In-hospital mortality was lower in non-shock patients (6.2% versus 63.6%; P < 0.001) and CS on admission was an independent predictor of in-hospital death.

CONCLUSIONS

CS on admission is an important determinant of treatment strategy selection and is associated with unfavorable prognosis of ACS patients admitted to hospitals without on-site invasive facilities.

摘要

背景

目的是确定急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者入院时心源性休克(CS)的预测因素,并评估CS与现实生活中的管理模式及结局之间的关联,这些患者来自未配备现场侵入性设备的医院。

方法

评估了56例(4.3%)入院时发生CS和1257例(95.7%)未发生CS的患者的院内管理及死亡率数据。

结果

既往心肌梗死、既往心力衰竭症状、年龄和糖尿病与入院时CS风险增加独立相关。共有23.8%的患者在索引住院期间被转运接受侵入性治疗,入院时发生CS和未发生CS的患者转运频率相似(21.4%对23.9%;P = 0.75),但在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)亚组中,休克患者的转运频率较低(21.4%对43.8%;P = 0.0027)。CS患者接受指南推荐治疗(包括抗血小板药物、他汀类药物和β受体阻滞剂)的可能性较小。非休克患者的院内死亡率较低(6.2%对63.6%;P < 0.001),入院时CS是院内死亡的独立预测因素。

结论

入院时CS是治疗策略选择的重要决定因素,并且与未配备现场侵入性设备的医院中ACS患者的不良预后相关。

相似文献

1
Predictors and in-hospital outcomes of cardiogenic shock on admission in patients with acute coronary syndromes admitted to hospitals without on-site invasive facilities.无现场有创设施医院收治的急性冠脉综合征患者入院时心源性休克的预测因素及院内结局
Acute Card Care. 2010 Mar;12(1):3-9. doi: 10.3109/17482941003637106.
2
Management and mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation vs. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Data from the Malopolska Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes.非ST段抬高型与ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的管理与死亡率。来自小波兰急性冠脉综合征登记处的数据。
Kardiol Pol. 2009 Feb;67(2):115-20; discussion 121-2.
3
In-hospital management and mortality in elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated in centers without on-site invasive facilities.在没有现场侵入性治疗设备的中心接受治疗的老年非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的院内管理及死亡率
Cardiol J. 2008;15(5):451-7.
4
Interhospital transfer for early revascularization in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock--a report from the SHould we revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? (SHOCK) trial and registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者早期血运重建的院间转运——来自“心源性休克时我们应该对闭塞冠状动脉进行血运重建吗?(SHOCK)”试验及注册研究的报告
Am Heart J. 2006 Oct;152(4):686-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.06.010.
5
Prognostic significance of new onset atrial fibrillation in acute coronary syndrome patients treated conservatively.新发性心房颤动对急性冠状动脉综合征保守治疗患者的预后意义。
Cardiol J. 2010;17(1):57-64.
6
Does current treatment of cardiogenic shock complicating the acute coronary syndromes comply with guidelines?目前针对并发急性冠状动脉综合征的心源性休克的治疗是否符合指南?
Am Heart J. 2005 Jan;149(1):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.06.004.
7
Impact of admission glucose level and presence of diabetes mellitus on mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome treated conservatively.入院时血糖水平及糖尿病的存在对接受保守治疗的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者死亡率的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Apr 1;103(7):954-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.008.
8
Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS). Characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Poland.波兰急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究(PL-ACS)。波兰急性冠状动脉综合征患者的特征、治疗及预后。
Kardiol Pol. 2007 Aug;65(8):861-72; discussion 873-4.
9
In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, admission glucose level is a strong independent predictor for 1-year mortality in patients without a prior diagnosis of diabetes.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中,入院血糖水平是既往无糖尿病诊断患者1年死亡率的强有力独立预测因素。
Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.028. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
10
Initial hospital pulse pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者入院时的脉压与心血管结局。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Aug;104(8-9):435-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of cardiogenic shock and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on the outcome of acute myocardial infarction: a national-level analysis.心源性休克和院外心脏骤停对急性心肌梗死结局的影响:一项国家级分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03984-6.
2
PEAL Score to Predict the Mortality Risk of Cardiogenic Shock in the Emergency Department: An Observational Study.急诊科用于预测心源性休克死亡风险的PEAL评分:一项观察性研究
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 16;13(11):1614. doi: 10.3390/jpm13111614.
3
Outcomes among ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients with cardiogenic shock and COVID-19: A nationwide analysis.
伴有心源性休克和新冠肺炎的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的预后:一项全国性分析。
Am Heart J Plus. 2023 Jan;25:100243. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100243. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
4
A Risk Stratification Scheme for In-Hospital Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者院内心源性休克的风险分层方案
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 4;9:793497. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.793497. eCollection 2022.
5
Treatment outcome of acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Mekelle, Ethiopia; A retrospective cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚梅克莱 Ayder 综合专科医院收治的急性冠脉综合征患者的治疗结果:一项回顾性横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 13;15(2):e0228953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228953. eCollection 2020.
6
Predictors of Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.心肌梗死和心源性休克预后的预测因素
Cardiol Rev. 2018 Sep/Oct;26(5):255-266. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000190.
7
Impact of intra-aortic balloon pump on long-term mortality of unselected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.主动脉内球囊反搏对非选择性ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者长期死亡率的影响。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2014;10(3):175-80. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2014.45144. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
8
Impact of diabetic status on the hyperglycemia-induced adverse risk of short term outcomes in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndromes in the Middle East: findings from the Gulf registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE).糖尿病状态对中东地区急性冠脉综合征住院患者高血糖诱导的短期不良结局风险的影响:海湾急性冠脉事件注册研究(Gulf RACE)的结果
Clin Med Res. 2011 Mar;9(1):32-7. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2010.946. Epub 2010 Sep 17.